Once hydrogen nanoparticles (Rydberg matter) are created, how long do they survive? If they survive for a long time, then these nanoparticles can be generated off line, stored, and feed into a reactor as feed stock like gasoline in a car engine.
How many miles can we get out of our LENR car using as fuel a kilogram of hydrogen nanoparticles. On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to know what the gas pressure behaved during cool down, when > the heater was replaced...how was the gas pressure maintained during heater > replacement, and how did the pressure behave as the temperature of the > reactor was brought back to operational levels. > I would speculate that the pressure remained below one bar during the > entirety of the recovery operation. This would tell me that once hydrogen > nanoparticles have been produced, they stay Reaction capable for an > extended period if not forever. > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Parkhomov has addressed the primary concern that I had with his >> experiment (power levels required to bring it up to the temperature needed >> to initiate the reaction). Additionally, he confirms something that Rossi >> recently stated about it being possible to restart the reaction after it >> has cooled. And it is reported that he affixed a thermocouple on the >> outside of the cell, alleviating that concern. >> >> >> http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/21/mfmp-reports-parkhomov-breakthrough-90-minutes-of-excess-heat/ >> >> On ECW, it is noted: >> >> "Dr. Parkhomov reports that the target temperature of 1200ºC in the >> fuelled reactor was achieved by the time the electric power had reached >> around 600 W (in contrast to 1070 W needed to reach 1200ºC in the dummy). >> Then within an hour, the regulator had decreased the input power to just >> 330 W to maintain the same 1200ºC. Approximately, this has been the power >> required to during the whole operation of the reactor. >> he thermocouple is fixed on surface of tube with fuel in the middle of >> the tube. >> Operation of the reactor was interrupted due to a heater burn-out at >> 10:50 on March 20 (Moscow time). Fortunately though, the tube with fuel >> wasn’t damaged. >> When a replacement heater was used, the reactor RESTARTED!! at 11:10 on >> March 21 and works still. >> This is the first independent report of high power LENR being able to be >> cooled down and re-started. >> It is difficult to grasp the significance of this information. >> Dr. Parkhomov, Thankyou." >> >> >> Possibly, this also addresses Dave's concern based on his models, but >> he'll have to weigh in on that. >> >> As long as the 600W wasn't more than was needed to reach 1070C, then you >> get a minimum COP of 1.8 (treating the experimental cell heat up power as >> its own control). I hate to nitpick, but it would be good to know what the >> max temperature would be if using 500W (e.g., 950C). The good thing is >> that the reaction will restart. He can turn it off again, and run 500W >> until it levels out at a maximum temperature. >> >> This is getting very close to ruling out alternative explanations. >> >> >
