Axil--Good evaluation--

I think you may have the mechanism for conversion of angular momentum spin 
energy to thermal lattice energy. 

Also keep in mind that the magnetic field may be the thing that set the 
resonant frequency of the dipole structure that accepts the quanta from the SPP 
system.  A variable magnetic field or an on-off field may provide the variety 
of frequencies so that a resonance occurs some of the time to allow the 
coupling before the SPP collapses.  

We still need the ultimate source of energy for the SPP--it seems it must come 
from the nuclear masses.  Hence there must be a coupling between nuclear spin 
energy and the SPP's.

Bob Cook
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 1:15 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Raising the level of LENR understanding- a model/example


  Regarding:
  “Excitation of Electron–Hole Pairs”

  Lets put some numbers on this concept to make it more understandable. 

  There is evidence that heat transfers its energy to photons in LENR. The 
wavelength of Far infrared EMF is about 1 millimeter. We know that the Rossi 
reactor produces a maximum EMF in the soft X-ray range or an EMF photon in the 
10 nanometer range.

  In the Ni/H reactor there is a process that increases the energy of the 
photon from 1 mm to 10 nm.

  Since 1 millimeter = 1 000 000 nanometers, there is an energy amplification 
factor of 100,000.  

  There is a nano structure that produces this amplification of EMF power by 
100,000. We know that when a photon is confined in a nano sized box, that 
photon will adjust its wavelength to resonate inside that box. The nano box 
that produces soft x-rays is sized to resonate in the circumference of 10 
nanometers. So the nano box has a radius of about 3 nanometers. 

  The heat energy is converted to dipole vibration by the free electrons on the 
surface of the metal.

  The spin of a dipole electron/photon hybrid or SPP is 2. But the nano box 
also amplifies this spin by a factor of 100,000 to conserve angular momentum.  
This is like an ice-skater who pulls in her arms to rotate in a smaller 
circumference. The tuck in of her arms increases her rotation rate.
    
  For every SPP that goes into the nano-box, its spin is amplified to produce 
200,000 Bohr magnetons. That is like having 800,000 magnetized iron atoms for 
every SPP that the heat photon produces. 

  When the nano box is filled to the maximum with SPPs, it will explode into a 
bosenova. At this point, the energy stored in the nano-box is returned to the 
system. This return happens when  the electrons and x-ray photons decouple to 
produce independent electrons and x-rays. These soft x-rays are seen in many 
LENR systems such as cavitation, Mills catalysts as black light, and Ni/H 
reactors.

  Because the SPP is a boson, coulomb repulsion does not limit the number of 
SPPs that can be packed into a nano-box. At this juncture, it is unknown how 
many SPPs can be packed into a nano-box before it explodes. But the number of 
SPPs could be very large. You can now see how a very powerful magnetic beam can 
be generated from heat energy. 
       
  The nano-box is a magnetic vortex or soliton because all the SPPs are 
coherent and form a Bose Einstein condensate. Like a tornado, the soliton 
focuses the magnetic field produced by the SPPs into a tight spot that shines 
on the matter near the soliton. This strong magnetic field does unusual things 
to the matter and space that falls within the influence of this magnetic beam. 
This concentration of heat energy into a focused magnetic field I believe 
underpins the nature of LENR.



  On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote:

    Dear Friends,


    We have many high level papers and theories having a small intersection 
with facts and reality of topology, nature and mechanisms. We can admire them 
but not use for solving LENR's problems. 


    As I show here:


    
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/03/raising-level-of-of-understanding-of.html


    At its turn, our prevailing simple(r) explanation of LENR needs a higher 
level of understanding- a positive example is presented.


    Peter



    -- 

    Dr. Peter Gluck
    Cluj, Romania
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to