On 3/26 Eric Walker said [snip] Continuing the analogy, what is the medium against which the system of charged elements is alleged to exert force by exploiting effects of relativity? [/snip] Eric in velocity derived relativistic effects there is no connection between inertial frames such that force can be exchanged and everything is based on the square law and a Pythagorean relationship between time and space. IMHO the opportunity exists but there is no linkage between near C and stationary or slow frames to exploit it. Positive accelerations and equivalent gravity wells of near C value are off the table. What is not off the table is near C negative accelerations and gravitational warps because you have London forces like Casimir effect that provide both the opposition to break isotropy and the linkage between inertial frames. I remain convinced that catalytic effects are nothing more than relativistic effects fighting with the isotropy to jerk reactants between a tapestry of different inertial frames based on the inverse cube of the surrounding geometry separation [confinement of virtual particle size] on the nano scale. I am not saying all the reactions are based on time dilation but rather the rapid change between lesser values of dilation in defiance of the square law [ie Casimir geometries break the isotropy] cause reactions to occur much more rapidly. Note the similarity between nano geometry of active powders and Mill’s skeletal catalyst Rayney nickel. Unlike near C spatial displacement a lump of Rayney nickel or nano powders do provide inertial frames in fixed proximity because they are based on confinement of virtual particles instead of spatial displacement. My pet theory is that the larger virtual particles still exist between the confining geometry but they shrink on all 3 spatial axii by virtue of time dilation.. a relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect. as stationary observers we are accustomed to Lorentzian contraction along only the 1 axis along which the near C object is being displaced – this is an inherent property of relativistic effects based on spatial displacement, Rhueda and Haisch describe it as a car accelerating in a rainstorm increasing the pressure of raindrops on the windshield for the direction of displacement but virtual particles and time are 90 degrees displaced to all 3 spatial axii. To suppress their occupancy thru Casimir confinement has no spatial bias and all 3 axii experience contraction equally //what appears as temporal dilation to us the external observer is spatial to the local observer which in this case would be any gas atoms migrating thru the suppressed regions between Casimir plates [which agrees with Naudt’s 05 paper that the hydrino is actually relativistic hydrogen].
To my point and your question about what medium the charged element exert force, The medium is the time axis from our perspective – Casimir force acts as a linkage between inertial frames allowing some small fraction of equal and opposite forces to become dilated such that from our perspective outside the device the equation becomes spatially unbalanced. IMHO you still need some mass to become older/time dilated as you push against it [thru likage] from a spatial vector it is displacing inside it’s inertial frame along a vector that is partially temporal from our perspective but appears totally spatial from it’s own local observation. Note Paradox twins are unaware of dilation of contraction / all seems normal within an inertial frame. The authors seem to suggest they can dilate radiation and therefore radiation pressure for which I have no opinion but my gut feeling is that the mechanism is more likely loaded gas atoms in the mirror walls of the device that are occupying suppressed regions and acting as a dilated target against which the radiation is acting. Fran From: Eric Walker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:04 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:prototype for "only" $99,000 On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Sunil Shah <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This change in an electric field is caused by the same force that gives us time dilation and apparent length contraction. This effect can’t be altered any amount of energy. So by using it to generate thrust you are in fact exploiting an infinite energy source. This sounds hand-wavy to me. ;) Just like the belief that heavier than air flying machines are impossible. No one realized that you could use air pressure to fly and change the momentum of the flying machine by using its environment to absorb the momentum. In the case of a flying machine, you have the force of propulsion from the gas being displaced by a propellor or expelled by a jet engine and an equal and opposite force exerted on the engine itself, which moves the flying machine forward. The forward movement displaces air over the airfoil as well as beneath it, causing a vacuum to form above the wing in the former case and a downward thrust of air which pushes the wing up in the latter. Air is the medium that makes all of this possible. Just as today no one realizes that you can use the effects of relativity to create propulsion. Namely, allowing the effects of relativity to absorb the extra momentum of a system of moving charged elements. Continuing the analogy, what is the medium against which the system of charged elements is alleged to exert force by exploiting effects of relativity? Eric
