Heres what seems to be some very controversial info from Galen Winsor, clear
back to 1986 He eats some Uranium at ~ 1:15 into the video. He also talks about
drinking and swimming in radioactive coolant.... Some of these claims seem so
outlandish that you have to think it is some kind of April Fools joke! But this
entire video of over 1 1/2 hr is so intriguing I couldnt quit watching it.
Galen Winsor is a nuclear physicist of renown who worked at, and helped design,
nuclear power plants in Hanford, WA; Oak Ridge, TN; Morris, IL, San Jose, CA;
Wimington, NJ. Among his positions of expertise he was in charge of measuring
and controlling the nuclear fuel inventory and storage.
　The Nuclear Scare Scam | Galen Winsorhttps://youtu.be/ejCQrOTE-XA The only
reason they put in a Emergency Core Cooling System in a nuclear reactor is to
destroy it.... 56 min into videoThe China Syndrome is a film writers fantasy...
59 min into videoThe owner, operator and regulators of three mile island
reactor 2 conspired to turn it off,(the external pressure helium gas system) so
that the ECCS would be employed, destroying the reactor from thermal shock.1:00
hr into video..They say things like over 50% of the reactor core went over 4000
degrees F without mentioning that this is the normal operating temperature of
the fuel rods. So they take this kind of information and bugger it all up so
that you dont understand what is going on; they give you a little bit of it. So
there was no accident at 3 mile island, No they did on purpose. Pioneering the
Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:40 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>
wrote:
This is somewhat off topic but . . . Here is a clever parody of revisionist
history. It is about the atomic bomb:
http://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/netsam/revisionist_history.html
Every statement in this document is technically correct, but the overall
impression it gives is ridiculous. People often use this technique to denigrate
cold fusion and other controversial science, and also to justify conspiracy
theories. I like the way the author keeps swapping the subject, in a sort of
intellectual game of Three-card Monte, going from uranium to plutonium to
hydrogen bombs, treating them as if they were the same thing. In cold fusion
the equivalent technique would be to talk about the lack of neutrons one
moment, Rossi's results the next, and then to say, "and yet no commensurate
helium production has been reported by Rossi."
Some sentences from the document:
1. Is there any evidence that a thermonuclear device exploded over Hiroshima in
1945?
No, absolutely none. According to leading historians and physicists, the
thermonuclear bomb was not invented until years after the supposed detonation
over Japanese territory.
2. Is there any evidence that a uranium-based "atom bomb" was ever dropped onto
Nagasaki, Japan?
Absolutely not. While many historians and journalists made this claim in the
late 40's and early 50's, everyone now agrees that no such bomb ever exploded
over Nagasaki. Yet there are some who still stubbornly cling to this supposed
"fact."
. . .
- Jed
