In a weak system like the Nanor or the Golden ball, I would predict that the only transmutation found would be isotopic shifts produced by protons transmuting to neutrons. Meson based fusion would not normally occur but it would not be impossible. But if it did occur, would it produce a gamma or an unstable isotope? Maybe.
I just looked at the co-deposition of palladium nanoparticles that Ruby produced. In that video, radiation, radioactive isotopes and charged particles were seen including heat. The power level in that system was in the milliwatt range. This tells me that the magnetic connection and the SPP duration was not long enough to shield the nuclear reaction from broadcast to the far field. Even through the LENR nuclear reaction occurred, it was too weak to communicate back to the soliton to establish a positive feedback loop and to remove the effects of the nuclear fusion reaction. When the positive feedback connection is made to the nuclear power source, the transmutation advances from the weak proton to neutron isotopic transmutation phase, to the more powerful meson phase. The LENR reaction might even get so powerful that a quark qluon plasma is formed and all kinds of strange transmutation patterns might emerge. Once the positive feedback connection is made to a nuclear power source, then the heat applied to the system does not pump the reaction as much as the nuclear pumping. When the nuclear pumping begins unless power is removed from the system, a meltdown will occur. On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > I just looked at the co-deposition video, and radiation, radioactive > isotopes and charged particles were seen including heat. The power level in > that system was in the milliwatts. This tells me that the magnetic > connection and the SPP duration was not long enough to shield the nuclear > reaction from far field broadcast. > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In a weak system like the Nanor of the Golden ball, I would predict that >> the only transmutation found would be isotopic shifts produced by protons >> transmuting to neutrons. Meson based fusion would not normally occur but it >> would not be impossible. But if it did occur, would it produce a gamma or >> an unstable isotope? Maybe. >> >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Rewrite to correct typos >>> >>> ------------------------------------------- >>> >>> An EMF model of particle creation >>> >>> I read an interesting paper about particles that can explain a few >>> things. >>> >>> Matter and Light in Flatland >>> >>> http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0401153.pdf >>> Also >>> http://yepezoj.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> This model of particle structure was invented to explain why a particle >>> can interfere with itself in a double slite experiment. The esteemed R, >>> Feynman could not figure this one out. The photon or electron must be in >>> two places at once, this means that the electron is also a electromagnetic >>> wave. >>> >>> As described in the reference, the electron and photon is a EMF wave >>> that is bent around on itself in higher dimensions. This many dimensional >>> EMF wave vibrates like a slinky (a vortex or toroid) where the front and >>> end are taped together. The projection of the wave is reflected in our 4 >>> dimensional world and that projection of a higher dimensional EMF structure >>> could appear in two places at once. These two projections can interfere >>> with each other. >>> This also explains why real particles must have a resonate energy level >>> to be real. For the electron, that energy must be at least 512 KeV. In >>> order for this slinky wave to form and connect properly from head to tail, >>> it must be of a correct amplitude and frequency. If this wave is less >>> energetic than the magic resonate value, the slinky wave tries to connect >>> head to tail in a vortex, but the wave is not the proper size and shape to >>> connect up. So the energy is fed back to where it came from and the >>> condensation of the particle is retried over again in an endless cycle. >>> >>> These failed attempts to produce a real particles are where virtual >>> particles come from. Only resonate energy levels make real particles that >>> will produce a properly formed EMF wave that will spin properly in a vortex >>> for a long time. This is why the lifetime of a virtual particle is so >>> short, because the EMF wave cannot connect head to tail in a vortex. The >>> vortex tries to form but it cannot link up head to tail and the nascent >>> wave falls apart. >>> >>> Because of the uncertainty principle, the vacuum produces flashes of >>> energy at a average rate but some flashes are weak and some are strong. The >>> weak flashes generate virtual particles that are short lived but the strong >>> flashes produce particles that become real because they are energetic >>> enough to connect up head to tail in a vortex. >>> >>> In LENR when heat is convered to magnetic EMF that pumps up the vacuum, >>> the vacuum becomes increasingly energized, the average value of the energy >>> content of the vacuum goes up, the maximum average energy level of the >>> flashes increase, and the number of strong energy flashes increase. When >>> the EMF is really strong, sometimes high energy real resonant particles >>> like mesons can flash into existence. >>> >>> It is these mesons that produce fusion in the volume of the vacuum >>> energized by the application of added EMF enegy. >>> >>> When the added EMF energy is not so great, the quarks inside the proton >>> change themselves around and a proton becomes a neutron. >>> >>> In the case where the EMF produces by a weak magnetic field that is very >>> small, the uncertainly principle can still get the strength of the EMF >>> flash to a high enough level to produce a meson or a neutron from a proton >>> but the rate of such real particle production is very small. This is why >>> very small systems like the Nanor and the Golden ball can produce LENR >>> results from very low levels of input energy. >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> An EMF model of particle creation >>>> >>>> I read an interesting paper about particles that can explain a few >>>> things. >>>> >>>> Matter and Light in Flatland >>>> >>>> http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0401153.pdf >>>> Also >>>> http://yepezoj.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>>> This model of particle structure was invented to explain why a particle >>>> can interfere with itself in a double slite experiment. The esteemed R, >>>> Feynman could not figure this one out. The photon or electron must be in >>>> two places at once, this means that the electron is also a electromagnetic >>>> wave. >>>> >>>> As described in the reference, the electron and photon is a EMF wave >>>> that is bent around on itself in higher dimensions. This many dimensional >>>> EMF wave vibrates like a slinky (a vortex or toroid) where the front and >>>> end are taped together. The projection of the wave is reflected in our 4 >>>> dimensional world and that projection of a higher dimensional EMF structure >>>> could appear in two places at once. These two projections can interfere >>>> with each other. >>>> This also explains why real particles must have a resonate energy level >>>> to be real. For the electron, that energy must be at least 512 KeV. In >>>> order for this slinky wave to form and connect properly from head to tail, >>>> it must be of a correct amplitude and frequency. If this wave is less >>>> energetic than the magic resonate value, the slinky wave tries to connect >>>> head to tail in a vortex, but the wave is not the proper size and shape to >>>> connect up. So the energy is fed back to where it came from and the >>>> condensation of the particle is retried over again in an endless cycle. >>>> >>>> These failed attempt to produce a real particles are where virtual >>>> particles come from. Only resonate energy levels make real particles that >>>> will produce a properly formed EMF wave that will spin properly in a vortex >>>> for a long time. This is why the lifetime of a virtual particle is so >>>> short, because the EMF wave cannot connect head to tail in a vortex. The >>>> vortex tries to form cut it cannot like up head to tail and the nascent >>>> wave falls apart. >>>> >>>> Because of the uncertainty principle, the vacuum produces flashes of >>>> energy at a average rate but some flashes are weak and some are strong. The >>>> weak flashes generate virtual particles that are short lived but the strong >>>> flashes produce particle that become real because they are energetic enough >>>> to connect head to tail in a vortex. >>>> >>>> In LENR when heat is convered to magnetic EMF that pumps up the vacuum, >>>> the vacuum becomes increasingly energized, the average value of the energy >>>> content of the vacuum goes up, the maximum average energy level of the >>>> flashes increase, and the number of strong energy flashes increase. When >>>> the EMF is really strong, sometimes high energy real resonant particles >>>> like mesons can flash into existence. >>>> >>>> It is these mesons that produce fusion in the volume energized by the >>>> application of added EMF enegy. >>>> >>>> When the added EMF energy is not so great, the quarks inside the proton >>>> change themselves and a proton becomes a neutron. >>>> >>>> In the case where the EMF produced by a weak magnetic field is very >>>> small, the uncertainly principle can still get the strength of the EMF >>>> flash to a high enough level to produce a meson or a neutron from a proton >>>> but the rate of such real particle production is very small. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
