The nuclear reactions are happening inside the nickel and on the outside
and in the gas. So you might say the nuclear reactions are happening
everywhere. The are all kinds of reactions going on making all kinds of new
elements. It is a nuclear free for all.

What nano-technology does is multiply a solitary low probability event
untold trillions of times. When we multiply a low probability event by
trillions upon trillions upon trillion of times, it become a certain
macro-scale event. Each of these uncountable events are random and produces
random results.

This fact makes analysis of transmutation a fruitless pursuit.

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Mark Jurich <[email protected]> wrote:

>   As many of you know, some preliminary Elemental Analysis (SIMS?)
> and ICP-MS of Parkhomov Ash/Fuel were released during ICCF-19 in
> Padua, Italy. At the FaceBook MFMP Site, some pictures of the analysis
> were taken and posted:
>
>
> http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/04/21/mfmp-publishes-parkhomovs-fuel-analysis-video-of-parkhomov-discussion/
>
> From the Elemental Analysis, it roughly looks like Ni is lost with a
> gain in Cu, but we all know how careful one has to be analyzing this.
> Some of the Nickel might have coated something other than the “ash.”
> Due to some issue, the Li Analysis is incomplete and will most likely be
> resolved soon.  I believe Parkhomov has 2 more Fuel/Ash Analysis being
> undertaken at this time, also (EDX and ?).
>
> An incomplete picture of the ICP-MS Analysis roughly shows the following
> (amongst other things & if we assume Rows 1 & 2 are Ash Analysis and
> Row 3 is the Fuel Analysis):
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/photos/p.959743037389729/959743037389729
>
>   6Li –>  7Li
> 58Ni –>  64Ni
>
> Obviously, it’s not as simple as this, but I wanted throw a “bone” out
> there for us to chew on.
>
> My guess is that Row 1 is a Best Run, Row 2 is a Pretty Good Run and
> Row 3 is the Starting Fuel (since Li, Ni & Cu are at almost Natural
> Abundances).
> Tomorrow morning I will talk to a Russian American and try to decipher the
> Cyrillic,
> since no one at the MFMP Site has done it yet...
>
> 6Li is depleted by half, with the difference showing up as 7Li.
> 64Ni shows a gain of about 5 with the loss roughly showing up in 58Ni.
> 65Cu Values & ? seem to be cut off in the picture, and hopefully we will
> get
> this data soon.
>
> What do YOU think is happening?
>
> As soon as I get a chance, I will post further links from the MFMP and
> E-Cat
> World Sites for the Internet-Challenged amongst us.
>
> Mark Jurich
>
>

Reply via email to