This is probably obvious to most Vorts, but I would like to expound a little
on the meaning of ‘dimension’…

 

We all grew up with the term ‘dimension’ referring to the physical, as in
‘two dimensions’, or ‘three dimensions’, and we can easily relate to the
three ‘spatial’ dimensions.  But to the physicist/mathematician, ‘dimension’
is a more general term referring to the number of degrees of freedom or
variables in a mathematical equation.  Prior to Relativity, physicists could
describe a point/object in the universe using the 3 physical or spatial
‘dimensions’.  Relativity added ‘time’ as a 4th fundamental variable to the
3 spatial ones… but time itself is not a ‘spatial’ dimension; it is just
another variable in the equations for Relativity… 

 

The articles referenced by Jones argue for a different meaning for ‘time’,
and the first article is about a group of researchers whose treatment of
‘time’ simplifies at least some of the math in physical theories, and avoids
the paradoxes arising from the current definition of time.  The articles
were a good read, and I hope they continue their work formulating a new
theoretical framework with a different definition for ‘time’, since it is
long overdue… and frankly, for many including myself, 3D+T was the
proverbial bean under the mattress of fundamental physics.

 

Off to count sheep,

-mark

 

From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 6:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Vo]:insight or obvious?

 

From: Roarty, Francis 

Ø       Time is a real dimension mediated by virtual particles. 

In the end – this argument dissolves into semantics. At least in the absence
of data, it does.

For instance the argument that “time-is-not-the-4th-dimension” essentially
can be parsed to prove that the fourth dimension is time. Go figure.

 
<http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2011/04/spacetime-has-no-time-dimensio
n-new-theory-claims-that-time-is-not-the-4th-dimension.html>
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2011/04/spacetime-has-no-time-dimension
-new-theory-claims-that-time-is-not-the-4th-dimension.html

 <http://hi.gher.space/classic/time.htm>
http://hi.gher.space/classic/time.htm

Reply via email to