Someone remarked that Parkhamov seems like an amateur, and it might be a
little unfair to hold him to "the standard that would be applied to a
tenured professor who regularly publishes in top-tier journals."

Let me point out that he is a tenured physics professor at the Lomonosov
Moscow State University. He may be retired. Here are his featured
publications at ResearchGate:

Article: Deviations from Beta Radioactivity Exponential Drop

Alexander G. Parkhomov

Article: An Analysis of Apparent r-Mode Oscillations in Solar Activity, the
Solar Diameter, the Solar Neutrino Flux, and Nuclear Decay Rates, with
Implications Concerning the Solar Internal Structure and Rotation, and
Neutrino Processes

P. A. Sturrock, L. Bertello, E. Fischbach, D. Javorsek II, J. H. Jenkins,
A. Kosovichev, A. G. Parkhomov

Journal of Modern Physics 01/2011; 2(11):1310-1317.

Article: Power Spectrum Analysis of LMSU (Lomonosov Moscow State
University) Nuclear Decay-Rate Data: Further Indication of r-Mode
Oscillations in an Inner Solar Tachocline

Peter A. Sturrock, Alexander G. Parkhomov, Ephraim Fischbach, Jere H.
Jenkins

Astroparticle Physics 11/2012; 42.

A professor with that kind of background knows darn well that you do not
add random data to cover blank spaces in a graph.

Perhaps he is the kind of professor who is better at theory than
experiment. Fleischmann was like that. Still, even someone who is dangerous
in the lab knows better than to stuff random numbers into a graph.

- Jed

Reply via email to