Axil, entanglement and the future directing the past might be part of the barrier to LENR theory. All control loops are based on normal linear time and no one is even suggesting instantaneous control or spooky action at a distance much less strategic posttest measurements that could be used to alter/control previous [from our perspective] operation [could pwm have some of this quality?].. but the geometry and environment do make it a candidate for this intriguing possibility. We have already seen anomalous radioactive decays but science as a community only thinks of time dilation in terms of near C or equivalent gravity wells.. there is very little experimental knowledge wrt Warps, for one thing the smooth square law transition between gravitational levels in a gravity well do not appear to apply- Cavity QED refers to breaches in isotropy where the inverse cube or even the inverse spacing to the 4th [for ideal metals] allows for an entire tapestry of different vacuum pressure in violation of macro isotropy. Also we are 3d creatures immersed in what we perceive as a constant sea of time and can only perceive velocity as dx/dt where dt is a constant – hence we see “stop” as 0dx/dt but if you can alter dt directly [through nano geometry/suppression] the whole “price you pay” for large values of dx and it’s Pythagorean relationship with time go out the window. The other oddball consequence of this particular rabbit hole is that we are equivalent to the “slowed down” paradox twin who comes back to earth young when compared to the radioactive gas exposed to warping [essentially a negative well]. IOW the tiny radioactive observer would perceive us as getting slow while from it’s perspective it is still decaying at it’s normal rate – only when the gas is removed and measured in our frame will the anomaly be exposed. Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 2:00 PM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:daily info and more about the Scientific Method Physicist Albert Einstein, the author of the theory of relativity and the father of modern physics could never bring himself to believe in quantum mechanics. This inability to believe is common in science in regards to LENR. No matter what experiments are done that show LENR, science will just refuse to believe. The root of his behavior is centered on the quantum mechanical nature of the LENR reaction. LENR is from another world that is simply not acceptable to the common experience of people. There are dozens of versions of quantum mechanics, each describing worlds that are far beyond the experience of the “real” world. Can the future direct the past. There are QM experiments that show this, but people just don’t believe that this can happen. Are there endless worlds of alternate realities. Even I don’t believe in that idea. Galileo would have a hard time with his credibility if he lived today and was a quantum experimenter. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: It is here: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/06/galileo-has-created-rigorous-scientific.html some surprises today and not bad Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
