This rapid rise in temperature is what Mills so aptly described in the recent Chinese Ni Li etc. test. Its not thermal excitation, its quicker than that. Spooky action at a distance may be merely changing magnetic fields in a coherent system connected by a single wave function at any given step in time.
Bob Cook From: Bob Cook Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 9:58 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: LENR survey please send feed-back! If the mouse is a magnetic field which modifies the differential levels between spin states of nuclei, and smaller differential energy makes coupling to electronic spin in a Ni lattice, more likely, given the small differential energy of the electron quantum states, then less of mouse (lower magnetic fields) could cause more cat LENR transitions and heat production by the change of mass (nuclear spin energy) to electron spin energy which quickly couples with the lattice causing thermal phonons. Bob Cook From: Axil Axil Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 2:49 pm To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR survey please send feed-backob 1.. Andrea Rossi December 29th, 2013 at 8:20 AM Steven N Karels: 1- yes 2- yes 3- moreless yes About the temperature: during the destructive tests the temperature raises for some second well above the melting point of Ni. This is why the “Mouse” cannot excite over a certain limit the E-Cat to maintain well stabilized operation. Warm Regards, A.R. On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: 1.. Andrea Rossi December 29th, 2013 at 6:10 PM Hank Mills: 1- no 2- confidential 3- no 4- the temperature of the Cat raises when the Mouse is turned off, lowers when the Mouse is turned on Warm Regards, A.R. On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: ndrea Rossi May 1st, 2015 at 7:48 AM BroKeeper: The ssm is enhanced by the fact that with the control system directing multiple reactors we can obtain a synergy between them using some of the reactors to drive others, where the driving ones ( mouse operation) are less than the cat ones. This way the ssm phases are substantially more that the driving ones. This synergy, obviously, is possible only with big plants ( so far). I cannot give the numbers, as correctly Steven N Karels anticipated and, also, after consulting Orsobubu, I have to add that what we have now is not the final result, things can worsen substantially in time and the final results could be either positive or negative ( this last phrase could be substituted by F-Something). Warm Regards, A.R. On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: How does the Mouse drive the Cat? On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: About the E-cat symphony, My occam razor vision is that the E-cat is a quite complex system which have to be controlled according to good "automatic control" practices, for linear and nonlinear systems. the way it works better with said "self-sustained mode" make me think that there are different time constant and multiple derivation degrees involved in the differential equations. (hard to say in english for me). for me SSM is a bit like a 1-piston engine. what Rossi talk about symphony is probably a 9 cylinders radial engine. for the rest I think that linear and non-linear control theory are used, in a context where the model is not very well known. I suspect that it is simply heat transfer coupled with LENR reaction that build the differential equations. probably the electric control just bootstrap and synchronized the 9-cylinders, like starter and spark plug. 2015-06-06 22:31 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil <[email protected]>: What is the nature of the E cat music? Music as we know it is carried in the air as sound. It involves vibrations in the air. Air carries music to us. In the E Cat, Hot Cat and so on, vibration is carries by dipole motion of electrons on the surface of the micro particles. When all the micro particles are in resonance, all the electrons on all the nickel micro particles are vibrating in unison. This is called a Bose Einstein condensate. All the dipoles become one and are in sync. These dipoles put out a strong EMF field that can influence other dipoles in other reactors. It may be that many reactors in the cluster become synchronize to form a global Bose Einstein condensate where all the dipoles keep each other in sync. This common background EMF field may allow for reactors to share energy between one another via a common EMF field that surrounds the cluster. In such a condition input power may not be needed to pump the dipoles between and among the reactors in the cluster. Maybe Rossi has discovered how to interconnect the reactors in his cluster to share in the dipole vibrations by using an EMF based backbone interconnect so that all the dipoles are joined together in a cluster wide Bose condinsate.? “The Mouse has a driving license, of course!” The Mouse may be a driver of the dipole vibrations. This could be how the mouse drives the Cat. An experiment to try to verify this idea is to have a reactor made up of a stack of multiple alumina tubes. Place fuel in all the tubes, but power only one of the tubes with a heater. Let us call that powered reactor :"the mouse". This mouse has a reduced fuel load as in the last MFMP test to keep it from blowout. The other tubes are fully loaded with fuel and use the heat from the mouse and the EMF generated by the mouse to produce the reaction in all the fully fueled tubes. The EMF field that comes from the Mouse might keep all the other reactors in the stack in check even if they are fully loaded with fuel. Rossi might have thought that just a demo of the mouse at Lagano would not show his technology. He might be using a reactor stack to produce self sustain mode. On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: My dear Readers, I have just published http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/06/questionless-survey-re-lenr-ideology.html It opens the possibility of a huge feedback. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
