>From Mark:
> FYI: This showed up on a web search today: > > http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20150171455.pdf Interesting. It's dated May 21, 2013. Fairly recent. Seems reasonable to assume the application date is around the time CIHT first became news. I noticed the ABSTRACT starts out saying: "An electrochemical power system is provided that generates an electromotive force (EMF) from the catalytic reaction of hydrogen to lower energy (hydrino) states providing direct conversion of the energy released from the hydrino reaction into electricity, ..." "hydrinos" Boldly stated in a patent application - in the first sentence. I doubt this is how Peter Zimmerman envisioned that the USPO would be treating Dr. Mills & Co hydrinos. I believe Zimmerman had on occasion boasted the notion that he was a tireless crusader against the existence of Dr. Millls' hydrinos and would do what he could to keep the USPO from legitimizing them. To paraphrase an old'sayin: The only good hydrino is a dead hydrino. But it just keeps on tickin! Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.orionworks.com zazzle.com/orionworks
