I posted on this http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/28/the-fine-tuning-argument-axil-axil/
The fine tuning argument. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:47 PM, AlanG <[email protected]> wrote: > > > <http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/article/68/6/10.1063/PT.3.2804> > http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/article/68/6/10.1063/PT.3.2804 > > > > > On 6/24/2015 8:09 AM, Bob Cook wrote: > > Jones-- > > > > *From:* Jones Beene <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 24, 2015 5:38 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Re: Resonance in a ceramic tube reactor > > > *Jones--* > > I think you are on the right track. > > We need a good description of the make up of protons and the cause of > their mass conversion. > > Philippe Hatt, a Belgian physicist has proposed such a model. Electrons > and positrons, which change their mass, are the constituents of protons , > neutrons etc. > > His theory is set forth at h is web page. As I recall 18 > electrons/positrons are involved in the makeup of the protone. He is able > to predict rest mass accurately, as well as magnetic properties. > > The following is a link: > www.phatt.com/unifyingtheory > www.phatt.com/combindingenergy > > *I identified these papers on Vortex on April 26,2015. * > > *Bob Cook* > > *From:* Bob Cook > > Ø > > Ø Spin flipping may be a coupling mechanism to create phonic > vibrations and heat. However what is the source of energy causing the spin > flipping? …You suggest it may be gluon mass loss. I would agree… > > Bob - To be a little more specific, a few months ago I was struggling to > frame a hypothesis called RPF. It proposes that protons vary in mass > around an average – and can transfer some of their mass to spin energy via > inelastic collisions that result in the temporary binding of two protons. > This could be coincident with the Lamb shift. Proton mass is not > quantized (nor is quark mass). > > Reversible Proton Fusion is a version of the diproton reaction, modified > for condensed matter instead of a gravity field. The solar version is the > most common nuclear reaction in the Universe, yet there is no permanent > transmutation to helium, most of the time. For every actual fusion even, > there are at least 10^20 reversals, back to protons (failed fusions but > NOT elastic collisions). The diproton reaction itself may produce energy > in the Sun without permanent fusion, but with mass converting to energy. > LENR provides a substitute gravity field in lattice confinement. > > When transposed to LENR, a similar diproton reaction seldom goes into > beta decay to form deuterons. Instead, energy is depleted from proton mass > as spin, and deposited in magnons as spin, via the Lamb shift, which is > spin-flipping. The energy of protons is regauged by QCD color charge > during the brief instant of a binding event - which may occur only once in a > large number of spin-flips. A tiny bit of mass of the proton (which > probably gluons mass, instead of quarks) is converted into energy. The > average proton can give up at least 7 parts per million of its net mass > and retain its identity, but that small mass depletion is huge– compared > to chemical energy. > > Essentially this would be the hypothetical mechanism whereby Lamb Shift > can produce net spin energy in magnons, which materializes as heat. It is > a conversion of mass to spin energy without transmutation, on the bottom > line. Magnons are the intermediary. Occasionally there is a full fusion, > which is why a small amount of radiation can be seen in LENR but it is > thousands of times too low to account for the heat. > > >
