In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 2 Jul 2015 19:00:45 -0400: Hi, [snip]
The paper from which this was taken unfortunately isn't very scientific. E.g. the claim that Brown's Gas vaporizes Tungsten is complete nonsense. I have done that experiment myself. The Tungsten does not vaporize, in fact it doesn't even melt. Instead the outer layer of the metal forms an oxide which then sublimates, leaving a "sharpened" point on the rod. If the tungsten melted, you would see a drop of liquid tungsten form on the end of the rod. You don't. You do see such a droplet however with a copper rod in the same flame. >See "Glass Pouring Test" > > > >Can you quote the specific passage where it says that a form of Hydrogen is >> involved that is heavier than air? > > >See "Glass Pouring Test" > > >> Hydrino molecules can be very small, and >> hence dense, so it isn't impossible, and may in fact be the only logical >> explanation for a form of Hydrogen that is heavier than air. >> >> The "Balloon test" and the "Bag test" shows that the gas must contain >LARGE particles of hydrogen. Oh why...and by large do you mean in volume or mass? Consider a hydrino(hydride) attached to another molecule forming a gas molecule. When the gas "burns" the hydrino may undergo further shrinkage, releasing energy in the process. If the result of the reaction is, among other things, nascent water molecules, then they may act as the catalyst that is responsible for further shrinking the remaining Hydrinos in the original gas. The net result would be a gas that apparently "burns". The Hydrino may be weakly magnetically bound, so that it lets go when heated sufficiently, but remains bound at room temperature. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
