A couple items on the list caught my eye.

Jed Rothwell wrote:
Notes from the 12th International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Sciences

November 27 – December 2, 2005, Yokohama

T. J. Dolan


The following brief summary refers to only some of the 60 papers presented at the conference.


Experiments


Yasuhiro Iwamura (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries) presented more data on transmutations of Cs to Pm, Ba to Sm, and Sr to Mo, using a variety of diagnostic techniques, including a detailed surface mapping using a synchrotron microbeam (100 x 100 micrometers). They found that the transmutations occurred in small concentrated sites on the surface. Afterward I asked him what labs have reproduced some of his transmutations, and he said Osaka University, Shizuoka University, Francesco Celani (Italy), and NRL (in progress).

A. Kitamura (Kobe University) coated films on the vacuum side of the Pd foil (Iwamura coated the gas side) and reported transmutation of Sr into Mo.

Irina Savvatimova (“Luch” Institute, Moscow) reported transmutation of Ba into Sm.

A. El-Boher (Energetics Technologies, Israel) used "superwave" modulation of the current in electrolysis cells to increase yield. He achieved 600% excess heat for 24 hours, and 150% for 134 hours. Irving Dardik (a physician) developed the superwave technique with regard to curing human illnesses, and it is found to have applications in several fields.

The numbers on this one sound fabulous: 600% excess heat sounds stunning. Is this paper online? I didn't see it in the index, though there appears to be other "superwave" stuff from El-Boher on your site going back at least to ICCF-10.

Anyone got any idea where "breakeven" is for a "typical" cold fusion cell? (Yes, I know, they're all different, there is no "typical" cell...) At what level of excess heat is total energy in likely to be less than recoverable energy out? (For that matter, what's the right way to even ask the question? It's pretty obvious what "breakeven" is for hot fusion, but for CF it seems a bit less clear.)

In other words, is 600% excess heat anywhere near "breakeven"?


Vittorio Violante (ENEA, Italy) used a HeNe laser to enhance excess power generation during electrochemical loading.

Yoshiaki Arata (Osaka University) observed intense heat generation during ingress of deuterium into a thin cylinder containing Pd nanoparticles.

Alexander Karabut ("Luch" laboratory, Russia) observed excess heat generation and transmutations during deuterium glow discharges, but not during Kr or Xe discharges. Using spark mass spectrometry, SIMS, and secondary neutral mass spectrometry they identified the emergence of many impurities, including abnormal isotope ratios for several elements. They also observed emission of gamma rays and x-rays.

Andrei Lipson and George Miley (Lebedev Institute, Moscow, and University of Illinois) reported emissions of energetic protons and alpha particles during controlled exothermic deuterium desorption from the surface of a Pd/PdO:Dx heterostructure. Using CR-39 detectors they found 1-3 MeV proton tracks and 11-16 MeV alpha tracks, with a yield about 0.005 alphas/cm2-s, reproducible during about 20 experiments. They also reported data indicating superconductivity in Pd hydride and deuteride.

This appears to be a PowerPoint slide set.  Is there a paper to go with it?

The slides are fascinating, though, sad to say, mostly pretty incomprehensible to this yokel. I had no idea that signs of superconductivity had been observed in loaded Pd, but it appears from your index that there are hints of this going back to at least ICCF-10.

Might it be possible to parley this aspect into back-door access to "conventional money" for research into CF, I wonder? 30K for a transition temperature isn't exactly sweltering, but it still qualifies as HT and it's totally different from "conventional HT superconductors", I think, and that should interest people.

For that matter, is that possibly what Lipson and Miley are already doing...?

[ snip snip ]

Summary


In his summary of the ICCF-12 conference Prof. Xing-Zhong Li said that CMNS has three “legs”:
·        excess heat generation
·        nuclear reaction products & transmutations
·        good reproducibility.
Many experiments have achieved the first two legs, but reproducibility has only been demonstrated in a few experiments, such as those of Iwamura. Prof. Arata is building a larger device (3 x 30 cm) to demonstrate reliable higher power operation.

That will be really interesting! I have no idea if using Pd as a sort of catalyst for high-temp D2 gas will every produce useful energy, but the tiny amounts I've read about it make it sound like the process may be a lot more reproducible than the wet-cell CF.

Reply via email to