there are many positive and negative article around this is not the best, too optimistic...
latest talk of the controversy http://www.digitaljournal.com/science/op-ed-emdrive-does-work-but-spectator-science-disagrees/article/441374 https://hacked.com/emgate-wars-continue-publication-peer-reviewed-emdrive-paper/ for those interested the paper of Tajmar is there http://tu-dresden.de/die_tu_dresden/fakultaeten/fakultaet_maschinenwesen/ilr/rfs/forschung/folder.2007-08-21.5231434330/ag_raumfahrtantriebe/JPC%20-%20Direct%20Thrust%20Measurements%20of%20an%20EM%20Drive%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20Possible%20Side-Effects.pdf inside there is evidence of the deformation of reality made by some article... they use initial weir null test, which was later corrected (and skeptic hide the correction) as in https://theconversation.com/heres-why-scientists-havent-invented-an-impossible-space-engine-despite-what-you-may-have-read-45454# there is a wiki there http://emdrive.wiki/Main_Page note that Michael McCulloch reports recently that - his page MiHsC is under attack by usual mind guard... is it our beloved tyy,pathoskeptic, science apologist, cimpy? - he is banned from Arxiv (I was not aware it was possible, from the difficulties to ban TPR1/Ferarra as reported by Brian Josephson) 2015-08-19 10:49 GMT+02:00 Man on Bridges <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > Just came across this article, may be interesting to read. > EM Drive - 'Impossible' rocket drive works and could get to Moon in four > hours > > http://manifestdestinytriforce.blogspot.nl/2015/08/em-drive-impossible-rocket-drive-works.html > > Kind regards, > > Rob > >
