On Dec 23, 2005, at 6:38 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
--- Horace Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the waveforms of two deuterons tunnel to the
locus of an electron,
There seems to be a problem with the Pauli exclusion
principle here. Two deuterons could tunnel into the
same waveform, perhaps even at several hundred degrees
K within the confinement of a metal matrix - but not
at the locus of a fermion... or at least that is my
interpretation of Pauli. Are you saying there is
evidence elsewhere for this tunneling of bosons into a
fermion waveform?
Jones
I did say "given an assumption or two"! 8^)
The Pauli exclusion principle only excludes superposition of two
fermions not having opposed spins, e.g. 3 free electrons. I think
there is evidence that a superposition event can occur between two
fermions that makes them act like a boson. Examples of this are the
ability of electrons to build Ken Shoulder's EV's (if they actually
exist), superconductivity (I suggest the formation of electron pair
bosons may be an alternative explanation of superconductivity) as
well as the proven existence of fermion Bose condensates.
The quantum waveform (psi) of any particle extends throughout the
universe. The integral of Psi^2 for a volume indicates the
probability of the particle's location in a given volume in a given
time. When two or more particles have an "event", creating a new
particle or particles, the waveforms of the old particles collapse,
and the new particles waveforms instantly extend throughout the
universe. (Yes, this means FTL events can happen.) If any event can
happen between any two or more particles, the probability of that
event in some volume of space is just integral of the overlap of the
psi^2 value of the waveforms in the volume. My concept is just that,
provided a 3rd (catalyst) particle can be involved in an event, its
being located between two other involved particles greatly increases
the probability of the 3 body event over the probability of the two
body event (excluding the catalyst) at the given distance. Further,
the event must be energetically favorable, and having two bodies of
one charge and one of the other ensures that the event is
energetically favorable with respect to coulomb charge. The wave
function collapse of two deuterons upon a boson consisting of two
opposed spin electrons would be even more energetically favorable!
Thus you have the 2 electron catalysis hypothesis. See <http://
mtaonline.net/~hheffner/DualElectronCatFusion.pdf>
I hope I got all that right 8^)
Horace Heffner
