Another similar bracelet

http://www.iewei.net/en/#HOME

On Monday, August 31, 2015, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

> *From:* ChemE Stewart
>
> Similar Item:
>
>
>
> Ø
> http://phys.org/news/2013-02-german-student-electromagnetic-harvester-recharge.html
>
>
>
> Yes – thanks for remembering this, Stewart, It appears that this effort
> will at least provide us with a baseline for determining how much benefit
> there is in capturing EM “smog” by various means.
>
>
>
> A long life AA battery has about 2.6 watt-hours (9300 joules) of useful
> energy, and a rechargeable AA about half of that. The German “harvester”
> requires 24 hour to recharge - and thus it can capture about one tenth a
> watt-hour per hour of recharge time.
>
>
>
> The ADGEX, if we can believe their spiel, is capturing another form of
> energy instead of background EM/RF smog, which allows it to put out 120
> lumen or light emission for 12 hours, with a 2 hour recharge. The time of
> the recharge is stated in one place as 2 hours but longer in another
> reference, so this detail needs to be firmed up.
>
>
>
> 120 lumens is equivalent to 2 watts - in a better LED lamp array. Thus the
> ADGEX will go thru 24 watt-hours in a single recharge, which is then
> rejuvenated at a rate of 12 watt-hours per hour, Therefore, this is about
> 120 times more energy capture than what is available from EM/RF smog.
>
>
>
> That is very significant – if we can believe it.
>
>
>
> Since the early product is for sale – then the best way to verify the
> claim seems to be to buy one and test it. If the flashlight works reliably,
> there is no reason (in principle) with mass production that 10,000 of them
> could not power an automobile and recharge overnight
>
>
>
> Jones
>
>
>
> Side note: As to what the circuitry consists of – it appears the batteries
> contain nickel. Notably, in many types of batteries, hydrogen is the charge
> carrier and nickel is found in one or both of the electrodes. The dense
> form of hydrogen known as IRH (inverted Rydberg hydrogen) would be an ideal
> charge carrier, especially in the form that Mills calls “hydrino-hydride”
> but BLP apparently could not bring this to market. Have the Russians done
> it for him?
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to