http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.0503
See how anapole EMF solitons satisfy experimental observations. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > http://phys.org/news/2013-06-simple-theory-dark.html > > Read this for more background on anapole EMF concentration. > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theory-radiationless-revolution.html >> >> Note: this point >> >> "The theory could have broad ranging applications from explaining dark >> matter to combating energy losses in future technologies." >> >> If you want to get into how Dark mode solitons and plasmoids can produce >> mass in EMF concentration. >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=2002MNRAS.333..360B&db_key=AST&page_ind=0&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_GIF&classic=YES >>> >>> Start out with the reference above and we will progress step by step to >>> show that Rydberg matter will satisfy all experimental observations that >>> connects LENR to dark matter. >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> From Axil: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > We know that Dark Matter is a result of Rydberg matter that >>>> >>>> > exists as a preferred form of hydrogen that is spread widely >>>> >>>> > throughout the universe. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> FWIW, it disturbs me to no end reading a Vort post that portrays >>>> speculative assumptions (however tantalizing those assumptions may be to >>>> some within the Collective) as undisputed fact. It's no different than >>>> hearing another so called undisputed fact claiming that hydrinos make up >>>> dark matter. One can get their fill of the hydrino model over at Dr. Mills' >>>> SCP group. It is enthusiastically supported by the BLP cheer leading squad. >>>> ((I suspect some of them were very happy to see me barred.) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So which is it, Axil? Rydberg matter, or hydrinos? I suspect you'd have >>>> a real fight on your hands if you decided to correct SCP's presumed >>>> misconceptions about the explanation for Dark Matter. Quite frankly, I >>>> don't know which model is the correct one, or perhaps I should say: The >>>> more accurate one. Perhaps in the end it may turn out to be the case that >>>> it's neither. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm going to sit on the fence some more and see what shakes out. Sadly, >>>> I think it's going to continue to be a long wait. Under the circumstance >>>> the best thing for me to do is try not generate posts filled with >>>> tantalizing speculation passed off as undisputed fact. Granted, that is >>>> easier said than done at times. Nobody is perfect. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Full disclosure: I admit my ignorance of the Rydberg matter model. Is >>>> there a reasonably brief explanation of the model posted somewhere that I >>>> might be able to read up on... hopefully an explanation that doesn't >>>> involve 20 pages of Integrals? At present all I have to go on is the >>>> suspicion that Hydrinos and Rydberg matter seem to be strongly related to >>>> each other, as if they are kissing cousins. As in the case of hydrinos, >>>> over the years I've acquired a vague impression that much of Rydberg matter >>>> involves altered states of hydrogen. Is that a correct assumption, or am I >>>> wrong on that? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Steven Vincent Johnson >>>> >>>> OrionWorks.com >>>> >>>> zazzle.com/orionworks >>>> >>> >>> >> >
