http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2663#
Multiboundary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement Orthodox science has just come up with a new type of entanglement to explain how black holes can radiate Hawking radiation. Many different types of particles/atoms can all be entangled by a multi-party mechanism. On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Axil has stumbled upon an explanation of the formation of Ni-62 > (which has been reported but with extreme doubt from many including some > Vorts). > > I have thought that the understanding of the extent of a coherent QM > system (entangled per Axil’s terms) is a key. And the tendency of such a > system to go to a lower potential by giving up this energy to thermal > energy consistent with theory that entropy increases is also important in > understanding the transformation of a coherent (entangled) system. > > Ni-62 is such a target for a system that can get to that configuration. > In the nano structure Axil has suggested all the constituents are present. > > This complex nano system seems to fit the bill, including a good high > temperature lattice of Ni to absorb and transmit thermal energy. > > Bob Cook > > PS: I agree with Higgins that the current standard model has a lot of > hand waving with many empirical constants for fitting things together. > Holston was right on about such a miss-placed focus in modern phyics. > > > > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, September 11, 2015 2:16 PM > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> *iggin* > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:time, separation and neutron tunneling cross section > > If we have something that quantum mechanically entangles two dissimilar > atoms, then these two atoms become the same combined atom at the same > location in space. Will their nuclei combine in a fusion reaction? > > https://www.sciencenews.org/article/everyday-entanglement > > In the Lugano test, it looks to me like the 100 micron nickel particle > covered with lithium became entangled as a single quantum system. All the > nickel and all the lithium became involved in a nuclear fusion reaction, > Yes all N atoms in that particle and the lithium that covered it...both > Nickel and Lithium...transmuted into pure Ni62 in a single fusion reaction > through entanglement. > > This is the only way that particle could have formed through transmutation. > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Why the strong force behaves this way - repulsion at close distance, and >> then switching to strong attraction with very short fall-off - is a core >> mystery of quantum mechanics and nuclear theory. That having been said, >> Don Hotson's analysis of the Dirac's equation as a TOE (theory of >> everything) has a very plausible explanation of the strong force, >> predicting both the very close repulsion and the strong attraction. This >> part of the description is in his 2nd paper, but you will need to read his >> first paper to understand the second. >> >> The strong attraction is an exchange force - sort of like a chemical bond >> of electrons, but with the components of the nucleon being shared between >> two nucleons. This sharing can only happen at a very small distance. The >> exchange force reminds me of the force between a magnet and its iron keeper >> - extremely strong at short distance and very weak at longer distance. Not >> sure this is a good physics analogy, but it comes to mind as I think about >> it. >> >> I find Hotson's analysis of what Dirac's equation implies to be very >> compelling. It really throws conventional quantum mechanics back on its >> heels! I have his papers, but there have been links to them several times >> in Vortex. >> >> Bob Higgins >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:10 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> But why does the force fall off with such a high power relationship >>> with respect to separation? If there are more than 3 spatial dimensions >>> then some of the acting flux might leak off into those mystery regions. >>> Otherwise, I am having a difficult time visualizing why it is not limited >>> in a manner similar to that seen with electromagnetic fields. Of course, >>> if the effects are explained as a result of experiments then one is left >>> with this question unanswered. >>> >>> Are we using data that is generated by curve fitting to observations as >>> compared to understanding the true physical phenomena underlying those >>> observations? If true, then there is a limited opportunity available to >>> anticipate new, so far unseen, forces that might come into play under new >>> conditions. LENR might be one of a family of possibilities waiting to be >>> discovered as better instrumentation is developed. Of course, serendipity >>> has its place in physics as it has always led to most of the major >>> discoveries. It has been said, "I'd rather be lucky than good." >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> >>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Fri, Sep 11, 2015 10:32 am >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:time, separation and neutron tunneling cross section >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 8:47 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone know why this interaction varies as the sixth power of >>>> separation? >>> >>> >>> Just to clarify -- the nuclear force is the one that drops off with the >>> sixth power (per Robin). The speculative relationship between the >>> "interaction half-life" and the separation distance is unknown, although it >>> would be great to know what it is. (I was just providing an example of >>> what it might be.) >>> >>> At the scale of nucleons the strong force, called the residual strong >>> force, or nuclear force, in this context, is what is left over from the >>> interaction of quarks and gluons within nucleons. The nuclear force is >>> effective at 1 fm, and the nucleons are bound together within the nucleus >>> through the exchange of mesons, which are quite massive. The more massive >>> the force carrier, the shorter its range. In contrast to the residual >>> strong force, the force carrier of the strong force is the gluon, which is >>> massless and interacts with quarks. (Credit for this goes to Wikipedia.) >>> >>> (I wonder if this means the range of gluons is far, and if not, why >>> not.) >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >> >> > >
