This sounds too good to be true.  I once discussed on vortex a the concept of 
heat radiation emitted from a hot object as being a method of extracting energy 
from that hot object by using the cold reaches of space as the second heat sink.

The radiation could be harvested by photo cells and turned into electricity.  I 
could see no reason why that would not work provided there is enough heat being 
harvested to make the scheme worthwhile at modest temperatures.  Certainly, if 
the temperature is sufficient to result in the emission of light, this is done 
everyday with solar cells using sun light.

These guys appear to suggest that there is a mechanical version of this concept 
that they are utilizing.  It is not entirely clear to me why one technique 
works while the other cannot unless the self conversion of heat into radiation 
is the key.   The laws of thermodynamics appear to prevent the direct 
conversion of heat into mechanical work without a well defined second heat sink 
nearby at a lower temperature.  Are these guys claiming to have found a way 
around this requirement?  I harbor doubts.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Sep 21, 2015 7:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:CONVERTING LENR HEAT INTO ELECTRICITY WITH UNIQUE AESOP 
ENERGY ENGINES


 
Selected experimental results reveal that LENR can produce charged subatomic 
particles as a result of appropriately applied  catalysts. AIRBUS has put 
direct electrical generation capability into their patent. Rossi has hinted at 
developing a new reactor design that might produce electric power directly. The 
NANOR has demonstrated the production of direct electrical conversion as a 
theoretically realized reality.    
   
  
  
Once the LENR development frenzy begins, direct electrical generation will be 
at the top of the R&D list. However, the    AESOP device could be a short term 
bridge solution until direct electrical production is developed.  
 
 
  
  
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Mark Goldes    <[email protected]> wrote:   
   
    
     
       
The Fuel-Free piston engines of Aesop Energy, LLC, may be useful to those 
interested in using LENR to produce electricity.
             
At least one LENR company is developing a Stirling engine, which almost 
certainly is a high-tech design, in order to be powerful and efficient. 
             
Still, it is Carnot limited and will have an actual efficiency below its Carnot 
efficiency. It also must reject heat as a waste product. 
             
Efficiency will undoubtedly be below 50% and may be much less. AESOP Energy 
piston engines are not Carnot limited.
             
The high temperatures developed by LENR will push the materials envelope to 
state-of-the-art, high-tech science & technology.
             
High temperature Stirlings will be expensive. The Stirling & heat generator 
combination will also require waste heat exchangers to dissipate unused heat.
             
Where electric power is the goal, the use of Aesop Energy's Fuel-Free Engines 
could streamline LENR development time and ultimate product costs. 
             
The Aesop engines are low to medium tech and are likely to be less costly to 
manufacture.
             
They may be no more expensive and need less R&D development time and materials 
to prove. 
             
No waste heat exchangers are necessary. 
             
Getting the heat into AESOP Energy’s Fuel-Free engines at elevated input 
temperatures, will be relatively easy.
      


      
See the link to the AESOP Institute website below.for more information about 
these seemingly impossible engines. 

      


      
     
      
       
        
         
          
           
Mark Goldes            
Chairman, CEO, AESOP Energy LLC             
            
             
            
            
             707 861-9070            
            
             
            
            
AESOP Institute website:              www.aesopinstitute.org            
            
             
            
           
          
         
        
       
      
     
     
    
  
  
 
 

Reply via email to