See references: google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&e…TUA&bvm=bv.46471029,d.dmQ <http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F1112.6276&ei=nI6UUeG1Fq-N0QGypIAg&usg=AFQjCNFB59F1wkDv-NzeYg5TpnyZV1kpKQ&sig2=fhdWJ_enNKlLA4HboFBTUA&bvm=bv.46471029,d.dmQ>
Experiments showing the same mechanism as listed below: "Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets in heavy water" arxiv.org/abs/1306.0830 Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles in the presence of Thorium aqua ions arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf In these experiments, nano geometry of particles converts light energy from the laser into vortex motion of electrons in a nanoplasmonic “Dark Mode” soliton produced on the surface of the gold nanoparticles. Without the gold nanoparticles, laser light alone is ineffectual in producing these effects in this type of experiment. If neutrinos were involved, then the laser would not be needed to produce the LENR reaction. The powerful emission of a nano-scale magnetic anapole beam by the soliton produces the separation of the vacuum into positive and negative energy zones. Through quantum fluctuation damping, the magnetic beam also forces the entanglement of the soliton with the U232 nucleus by pumping high levels of magnetic energy into the vacuum. This vacuum energy pumping using EMF energy from microwaves also happens in the EmDrive system under development by NASA where some laser beam probes exceed the speed of light. On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Axil Axil > > > > Ø No matter where the experiment is performed, neutrinos are not a > stimulant or a causation of of muon production: light is. > > > > You do not know that. If it is your opinion, it is illogical – unless or > until there is experimental confirmation. Sure light is important, but that > does not eliminate other inputs as being equally if not more important, > especially if they are normally ubiquitous inputs – like neutrinos. > Neutrino flux is considered a constant, and that is why it must be altered > in order to make an analysis. > > > > Until the proposed experiment is run with a variation in flux, no one can > know the contribution of the neutron flux to muon formation. > > > > > > >
