On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Teslaalset <robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com> wrote:
The Ni62 amendments to US2009125444 were sent to the patent office in April > 2013 while Rossi’s patent US9115913B1 originated as filing in March 2012. > US91159B1 does not mention specifically Ni62 in the claims, but instead the > general term ‘Nickel’. These claims were not amended to be more specific at > a later stage in the patent process, probably for a very good reason. > Here is the patent application I was thinking of, where results similar to (the same as?) those of the Lugano test were incorporated as evidence: http://www.google.com/patents/US20140326711 Only the byzantine energy calculations are included. There is less than the usual reference to different isotopes of nickel. I found nothing more specific than "nickel," and there is no mention of the ICP-MS, ICP-AES, SEM/EDS or ToF-SIMS results. I assume the evidence goes back to the Lugano trial, but it's hard to say for sure. Eric
