The Ni62 result from Lugano might be an exception, a one in a million case that is exceptional in the extreme. It is best for Rossi to down play such a surprising result.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is interesting to see Rossi distancing himself from the Ni isotopic > fuel-to-ash shifts suggested by the Lugano experiment, and is instead > focusing on the isotopic shift in the Li. It could be that he knew from > the beginning that the 62Ni in the Lugano ash analysis was either error or > he knew it was part of the fuel. Since in other comments he seems to be > convinced of the value of 62Ni, the latter explanation may be more likely. > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Oct. 6, 2015 >> >> Interview With Andrea Rossi, LENR Energy Pioneer >> >> David H. Bailey, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (retired) and University >> of California, Davis >> >> Jonathan M. Borwein, Laureate Professor of Mathematics, University of >> Newcastle, Australia >> >> >> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-h-bailey/interview-with-andrea-ros_b_8248624.html >> > >
