Hi,

I typed up some notes that come from an email exchange between Robin
and myself.  They are about the possibility of the forced "decay" of
isotopes that do not normally undergo alpha decay (emission of a
helium-4 nucleus).

Eric



This briefly describes a possible alpha decay channel in otherwise
stable elements.  It is inspired by a recent paper by Urutskoev and
Filippov [1], although, inconsistent with their pessimism that
“transformations” are unlikely to produce much in the way of energy,
the pathway proposed here might produce useful energy if it can be
made to happen at scale.

Certain isotopes are unstable under alpha decay, for which, over a
period of time, an alpha particle will be emitted.  Once the alpha
particle has departed, the resulting daughter nucleus will have four
less nucleons.  For example:

187Re => 4He + 183Ta + 2 MeV (half-life ~ 41e9 years)

Here a rhenium-187 nucleus has been observed to alpha decay to
tantalum-183 with a half-life of about 41 billion years.  There are
other isotopes that are observed to be stable, but which, if an alpha
particle could somehow be separated out, the reaction would be an
exothermic one:

192Pt => 4He + 188Os + 2422 keV (no observed half-life)

In this case, if a platinum-192 nucleus could be made to part with an
alpha particle, the decay would be to osmium-188 and would produce 2.4
MeV of energy.  Because there has been no observed half-life,
platinum-192 is said to be “observationally stable.”

The line between isotopes that are stable and unstable under alpha
decay is not a clear one.  There is a known relationship between the
energy of the separation and the half-life.  All else being equal, the
higher the energy of the separation of the alpha particle the shorter
the half-life.  Typical half-lives of heavy even-even nuclei range
from ~ 0.1 second, at ~ 10 MeV (thorium-218), to 1e18 seconds, at ~ 4
MeV (thorium-232) [2].  The relationship is roughly logarithmic, so
that if you go below 4 MeV, the half-lives get longer and longer.
Presumably some isotopes are still unstable against alpha decay and we
simply haven’t developed the methods to measure the decay rates
because they are of such long duration.

One question is whether isotopes in which there is no observed
half-life actually are unstable under alpha decay, and the half-life
is simply too long for us to measure it.  If so, perhaps these
long-lived isotopes are actually only “quasi-stable,” we can do
something to the system to speed up their decay.

Assume for the moment that electrons can do the trick.  Here are some
possible reactions that would result under a PdD electrolytic system
with typical impurities in the palladium:

e- + 190Pt => e- + 4He + 186Os + 3252 keV
e- + 192Pt => e- + 4He + 188Os + 2422 keV
e- + 191Ir => e- + 4He + 187Re + 2083 keV
e- + 204Pb => e- + 4He + 200Hg + 1969 keV
e- + 194Pt => e- + 4He + 190Os + 1522 keV
e- + 195Pt => e- + 4He + 191Os + 1176 keV
e- + 206Pb => e- + 4He + 202Hg + 1135 keV
e- + 193Ir => e- + 4He + 189Re + 1018 keV
e- + 197Au => e- + 4He + 193Ir + 972 keV
e- + 196Pt => e- + 4He + 192Os + 812 keV
e- + 208Pb => e- + 4He + 204Hg + 517 keV
e- + 207Pb => e- + 4He + 203Hg + 392 keV
e- + 198Pt => e- + 4He + 194Os + 107 keV


As can be seen, all of these reactions are energetically possible.  If
the electron can somehow be made to decrease the half-life of what
we’re calling “quasi-stable” isotopes, then the ones with more
energetic alpha separation energies might start to decay at a rate
that would be observable and possibly even sufficient for generating
energy.  Since the above reactions are for impurities in palladium,
they might be a source of the helium that has been seen in PdD LENR
experiments.

What might cause electrons to decrease the half-life of quasi-stable
isotopes, so that they decay at an appreciable rate?  Alpha decay is a
quantum mechanical tunneling process in which an alpha particle
tunnels through the width of the Coulomb barrier rather than crossing
over the top.  A change in the charge density around the volume of the
nucleus (e.g., under the agency a discharging arc of electrons passing
through the volume) might modify the Coulomb barrier and possibly
decrease its width.  With the decreased barrier width, decays that
would have taken too long to measure might now proceed with an
appreciable half-life during the time that the arc is underway.

If electron-mediated decays of this kind were responsible for the
helium measured in PdD electrolysis experiments, they might explain
the correlation between helium and heat that has been seen.  In
addition, since the separation energies are relatively small, they
will be on the order of ~ 1 MeV per alpha particle nucleon or less and
will result in relatively little penetrating radiation.  But there
would also be many difficulties that would need to be explained.
First, there is nothing obvious about why there might be a hydrogen
isotope effect, which has been seen in many PdD LENR experiments; and
indeed there is no obvious role to be played either by hydrogen or
deuterium. (Note that this is different than saying that there is no
isotope effect or that deuterium plays no role.)  Second, a more
in-depth investigation shows that decays of this kind are unable to
explain many of the transmutations that have been reported.  Third,
neither lithium nor nickel are expected to participate in this
process.  So if excess heat is really happening in the nickel system,
it would need to be explained by something else.

For these reasons, If the alpha decay process described here is
eventually found to occur, there are many questions that come up.  It
also raises the possibility that there several unknown nuclear
processes involved in LENR rather than a single one, each of which
have escaped scrutiny up to now.  This takes us in a direction
opposite of the “conservation of miracles.”

The general idea described here was anticipated by William Barker in a
1991 patent.  Barker was focusing on remediating radioactive waste,
while the focus here has been on initiating alpha decay in otherwise
stable nuclei.


[1] Leonid Urutskoev, D. V. Filippov, "Phenomenological model of
collective Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (Transformation).”
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/leonid-urutskoev-phenomenological-model.html
[2] Krane, Kenneth, "Introductory Nuclear Physics," 1988 (John Wiley &
Sons), p. 249.
[3] William A. Barker, “Method for enhancing alpha decay in
radioactive materials” (patent).
http://www.google.com/patents/US5076971

Reply via email to