I don't agree with this. Google "Patterson Power Cell" and look at the
COPs he was getting. Either this product had a strong potential for a
new energy source or it worked by some "expendible" as Mr. Jones has
discussed. And it was a light water cell! I remember a decade ago when
there were whisperings of excitement about Motorola buying the cell
technology. I can't help but believe that this energy "threat" was
squashed (game, set, match).
Speaking of solid state OU devices, what ever happened to Wingate A.
Lambertson's "World into Neutrinos" Cermet technology? I haven't seen
anything on him in almost five years.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Coviello
Actually, I would propose that cold fusion might die from another cause
of death, irrelevency. For one thing cold fusion might be provable
beyond a doubt in coming years, but it might not be scalable to be
useful in energy production and might just remain a useless laboratory
curiosity for decades that may or may not one day be applied to some
useful purpose.
___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com
