Without reading through these parers, did Biberian do a
fuel preparation preprocess as Rossi did in the Lugano fuel?

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Jack Cole <[email protected]> wrote:

> I wrote a short post
> <http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2015/10/17/biberian-excess-heat/> about
> two papers that are of interest, but are negative regarding Ni+LAH.
>
> Jean-Paul Biberian has conducted a series of experiments with the
> Parkhomov formula (now known to be a partial formula of Rossi).  The results
> after some 20 experiments
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BVHZuSDlWRHRsNVc2X3FpZU5wZ1RIUXdCWThR/view>
>  utilizing
> mass flow calorimetry revealed no excess heat.  Additionally, Budko
> and Korshunov report
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BeXZmbXBpZ3c5QkhfelNjYTh1azIzaTduM2Fr/view>
>  a
> series of 17 experiments generating no excess heat.
>
> From Biberian:
>
> Reproducing Rossi’s experiment following Parkhomov’s process is not as
> easy at it seemed. After more than 20 experiments with nickel and LiAlH4 in
> different configurations, within the precision of the calorimeter of +/- 2
> Watts, no excess heat was measured. In this paper we have outlined some of
> the difficulties related to this method.
>
> Thanks to Peter Gluck
> <http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/all-papers-presented-at-airbus-iscmns.html>
>  for
> making these papers available.  My conclusion at this point is that nickel
> and LiAlH4 does not reliably produce excess heat, and if it does at all, it
> is rare.
>
> Jack
>

Reply via email to