Thanks Peter.
The latest from Paillet & Meulenberg is one of the better papers here, and it sews up a few lose ends from Vavra: “Electron Deep Orbits of the Hydrogen Atom” : https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BZ3Y0Z1N4WGFReUg5Z19UVEJlWE43cU56d0lV/view?usp=sharing But …regrettably they add yet another unneeded designated name for the fraction species- “EDO” (to dozen or more names already out there). What needs to happen now is to reconcile this approach with Holmlid’s 10+ years of experimental work. Holmlid demonstrates substantial chemical energy (50 eV) remains in the dense species, but P&M do not show this. This is an unexpected result - differing from Mills, who is usually given credit for the denser species. “Unexpected” in the sense that the f/H species has enough stored chemical– to account for all the thermal anomalies which are seen in all of the LERN experiments going back 25 years ! Plus there is nuclear energy as well, due to the improved closer spacing – but again: who needs it? From: Peter Gluck http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/all-papers-presented-at-airbus-iscmns.html
