These SPP are inherently coherent. This means that they all live in a state of bose einstein condensation(BEC). When a nuclear reaction occurs within this BEC, the nature of the nuclear reaction changes. Everything is entangled. Super absorption and super-radiation comes into play. The rules that work for neutron based reactions no longer apply.
The decay energies from meson decay go right back into storage within the SPP. Using neutron based thinking to understand how LENR reactions work is a mistake. All these LENR reactions need to be understood in their own rite. This study will be one of the major LENR research efforts during this century. There will be a lot of work required to get through all this LENR research involing the ins and outs of the LENR nuclear reaction.. On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Stephen Cooke <[email protected]> wrote: > One negative point to this idea I suppose is that if a pion is absorbed by > a nucleon pair in a nucleus the whole mass energy in the pion will be > released so if even a stationary pion was absorbed the final 2 nucleons in > the pair will be ejected with kinetic energy about 63 MeV each. I suppose > it is difficult to see how these nucleons would not generate gamma or > neutrons on interaction with other nuclei. > > Also on the negative side: If a pion is implicated and needs to be > generated within a nucleus, i suppose if this is not from a high energy > collision it would need to be created in a nucleus with higher total > binding energy than the pion mass energy. This would be a medium weight > nucleus so if we assume 8 MeV binding energy per nucleon it would probably > require a nucleus heavier than Oxygen at least. > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:16:09 +0200 > > > 'The amount of energy needed to create a free pion is large; the rest mass > for a pion is ~ 135 MeV' > > Very true this is also true for the muon which has a rest mass for a pion > is ~ 106 MeV. > > I'm not sure if muons can be generated without pions? muon pair production > would require even more energy. > > The energy is also quite high compared to the binding energy of light > Nuclei. > > If I am right I think the laser produces much less thermal energy too. > > It is difficult to imagine how either muons (or pions) can form with out > some kind of collective resonance effect or an additional high MeV energy > source such as sufficient energy from a high energy fusion event or more > even strangely a nucleon decay to mesons. > > It will be interesting what Holmlids observations and explanations say, > I'm quite curious as you say he could well have another explanation. > > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:47:08 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration > To: [email protected] > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Stephen Cooke <[email protected] > > wrote: > > If any was produced we would need to balance this against those the energy > required for pion production. > > > The amount of energy needed to create a free pion is large; the rest mass > for a pion is ~ 135 MeV. Consider that the largest amount of energy > typically discussed in the context of cold fusion up to now has been ~ 24 > MeV. Holmlid's observations are likely to go back to something other than > the generation of pions. > > Eric > >
