I also think it is good idea think to think of the NAE as consisting of an oven even if the oven is only a room at a temperature of 20 C.
Harry On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:22 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > You are making a valid point. My bet is on the exothermic activity > within the fueled vessel since the other one should behave like any other > random piece of metal. The real question is whether or not enough time was > spent generating heat to eliminate the possible chemical reactions. I > suspect not. And, careful calibration must be established to ensure that a > real difference in temperature exists. > > I approve of the technique of using an oven to establish the operating > core temperature instead of heating windings with electricity. Both > methods should result in the generation of core heat, but using the oven > appears to be a significantly better way to balance the operational > temperature between the two vessels for comparison. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: H Veeder <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, Oct 20, 2015 11:26 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]: Translation of Russian paper on Ni-H experiment > > It seems to me that based on the given data it is possible to interpret > the temperature difference between the empty vessel and the vessel with > "fuel" ( their quotation marks) as resulting from either endothermic > activity or exothermic activity in the vessel with "fuel". > > Harry > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This morning I translated the recent Russian paper, "The Question of >> Excess Heat in Nickel-Hydrogen". If you are interested, you can get a copy >> of the English version from LENR Forum or from my Google drive at: >> >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2ZzVib0JtOWtyaXc >> >> Bob Higgins >> > >
