In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:29:59 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>That way is Holmlid’s finding of nucleon disintegration following laser 
>irradiation of dense deuterium clusters. Ironically, it provides far more net 
>energy than does nuclear fusion. 
>
>
>The most cogent argument for nucleon disintegration is that in the standard 
>model, every nucleon contains matter and antimatter in close proximity. No one 
>needs to be convinced that matter and antimatter can be made to annihilate. 

1) According to the standard model, there is no antimatter in close proximity to
matter. I.e. up and down quarks are not one another's anti-particle.

2) If the standard model is wrong and baryons are really made of muon anti-muon
pairs, then there is anti-matter in close proximity to matter.

3) It is not certain that Holmlid is correct about the nature of the particles
he is detecting.

4) There is a chance that his laser is accelerating charged particles to the
extent that they are capable of creating exotic particles in collisions.

(You may recall that I suggested this as a method of producing muons for a muon
catalyzed fusion driven neutron "factory" that would produce fast neutrons for a
fission reactor some years back on this list.)

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to