http://hfmphysics.com/2014/SlidesTutorials/Wen.pdf
See slide: String-net/entanglement unification of light and electrons • Q: Where do light and electron come from? A: They come from qubits that form the space (the qubit-aether). • Q: Why do light and electron exist? A: Because the qubits form a string-net condensed state. • Q: What are light and electron? A: Light waves are collective motions of long “strings” and an electron is one end of a long “string”. → A unification of matter and information On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > To Jones' point regarding annihilation and disintegration ... These are > not the same. Annihilation is the total conversion of entities having mass > into energy. Disintegration is the breakup of a composite particle into > its constituents. > > To Eric's question ... A proton is a composite particle. The sub-nucleonic > structure of a proton or neutron (or muon) is arguable. Bohr believed we > would never understand the structure of a nucleus due to the uncertainty > principle. We have had to infer a lot from indirect experimental results. > Understanding the sub-nucleonic world will be even harder. Hotson believed > that electrons are positrons were one and the same; simply out of phase in > multi-dimensional space. He believed that protons and neutrons were > constituted of epos that were orthogonal in 10 dimensional space. > Interestingly the size of an epo is the size of a proton or a neutron. > Another coincidence is that charge only comes in +/- the charge of the > electron. Why would the all charged nuclear particles only have the charge > of an electron? If the proton were composed of epos less one electron, it > would have a net positive charge of the electron. The quark descriptions > having +2/3e or -1/3 e charge seems contrived. Hotson argues using Occam's > razor that it makes more sense that there is only one particle (the > electron) and all other particles are made from the electron and its > dimensionally out of phase image, the positron. > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *From:* Eric Walker >> >> Protons are fermions. At the LHC, they routinely collide protons. These >> protons are said to disintegrate. >> >> >> > Note as well that the Pauli exclusion principle applies to fermions of >> the same kind and quantum numbers. If Hotson argues that an electron and a >> positron would normally obey the Pauli exclusion principle, he is not >> applying a principle of mainstream physics that had prior to that been >> overlooked. >> >> Yes. And beyond that - we can integrate Hotson to some degree within the >> standard model by assigning his theory to applicability in a more >> fundamental dimension, instead of 3-space. His BEC is next to impossible >> to fully reconcile as a physical reality in 3-space, but it fits into a >> context of a foundation-dimension (first dimension ?). >> >> >
