When Holmlid.s experiments on LENR get out, there is some months of maybe a year, its implications are going to blow the tops of of many close minded heads. I detect some panic setting in here even among the vorts. I will watch you with great anticipation and see how you will cope with the new reality.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:56 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps it is as simple as what you suggest CB, but does that explain > every case? Can we be confident that there are no future particles to be > discovered that behave in a different manner although they have similar > spins? If not, then why call it something fancy like the Pauli exclusion > principle instead of just spin states? I suspect a more complex > underlying cause exists. Do you suppose I am becoming too skeptical? > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: CB Sites <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Oct 26, 2015 12:48 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid > > Dave, Doesn't the Pauli exclusion principle come about from the quantum > mechanical magnetic moment of the particle's spin state. That would seem > to be a physical attribute of the particle and not something that can > easily be wiped away. > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:39 AM, CB Sites <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Eric. There are a lot of interesting ideas presented in that >> slide show, many of the ideas I've seen commented on here. In one of his >> last slides he mentions theoretical solutions, one being multibody fusion >> hinting at a Chubb's style n-body fusion. Conceptually I've always found >> the S & T Chubb line of theory for cold fusion to be elegant and plausible. >> There is no reason why N-body solid state quantum mechanics can't apply to >> hydrogen in metal like it does to electrons in a metal. Quantum band states >> of H on Ni have been demonstrated (as a surface effect). *Sorry I don't >> recall the 1980's paper* I think it was in Science. >> >> Anyway, as new experimental developments have come about, the solid state >> concepts applied to protium/metal make their theories less applicable. The >> Rydberg atomic fusion process would seem interesting if not so far >> fetched. Maybe if I understood the quantum mechanics of how a Rydberg atom >> formed in a metal lattice at temps above room temperature. And then how to >> prove it. I think I need to understand the theory a little more. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:52 PM, CB Sites <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I found that to be a very interesting slide show. Is there an >>>> audio/video track of the lecture to go with it? >>> >>> >>> That is from HyperPhysics, a Web site authored largely by Rod Nave, now >>> a retired physics professor from Georgia State University. There is no >>> accompanying audio or video that I am aware of. It's inspired by the old >>> HyperCard program. I have found it a very useful site. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >>> >> >
