dirac said that the partner of the electron had negative mass. This bothered people so Feynman said that the positron was just a negative particle going backward in time. This concept of going back in time is important somehow.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > You ask a very good and hard question. As an EE, I find much of Hotson's > description much more satisfying that what I was taught in school. > However, I wish Hotson was still around (now deceased) so that I could > visit him to come to a greater understanding of his theory. He describes > that the negative energy sea a is mass-less condensate of epos. When the > epos form their DDL-like tiny orbits around each other, the Dirac solution > for the orbit represents a "spinor field" that I find hard to grasp. In > the spinor field, the particles have to orbit 720 degrees to get back to > where they start. As the electron orbits the positron, the two switch > roles part way around. Married together with his concept of discretezed > time, the result is an orbit that looks more like two particles on the end > of a string that just blink back and forth between being electrons and > positrons. As part of this all, he has a description of the origin of > inertial mass that I cannot entirely understand yet. > > The net effect is that, yes, the inertial mass is used up in the dual > photons of 511keV in transition to become epos, but that is not the total > energy of the particles - they just gave up their inertial mass into energy. > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 7:01 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Bob >> >> Why does the electron charge to mass ratio come out in support of it >> having 511 keV of energy if it really has much more? That seems >> contradictory. The way I understand it, all of the energy has a mass >> equivalent. >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob Higgins <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sun, Oct 25, 2015 3:05 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid >> >> That is the energy given off to send the normal space positronium atom >> into a DDL-like minimum energy orbit. When the electron-positron orbiting >> pair becomes in the DDL orbit (orbital radius about the diameter of a >> proton), it becomes undetectable and it is part of the negative energy >> sea. It is still polarizable and it is the displacement of the epo sea >> that provides electromagnetic "displacement". According to Hotson, the epo >> (in the DDL orbit) has no inertial mass - for explanation of the origin of >> mass you will have to read Hotson's papers. The epo sea IS the inertial >> mass-less ether. >> >> Note that the 511keV is NOT the total energy of the electron. When the >> spin energy of the electron is included, the total energy is over 16MeV. >> The 1022keV (two photons of 511keV each) is the energy given up to >> transition to the DDL state epo from the positronium atom. >> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Regarding electrons and positrons in particular, Hotson rightly points >>>> out that these two particles are fermions. As fermions, they are forbidden >>>> to be in the same place at the same time, and so cannot annihilate. Instead >>>> of annihilation, they fall into orbit around each other. When (if) they >>>> reach a DDL orbit, the become a part of Dirac's negative energy sea. >>>> >>> >>> If positrons and electrons do not annihilate, where do the two >>> oppositely-travelling 511 keV photons come from as a result of the activity >>> of beta plus emitters? (Note that 511 keV is the mass of an electron or >>> positron.) >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >> >
