Hi Axil
I have a few questions about Rydberg Matter and SPP that maybe you know the
answer to:
1. I understand that Hydrogen is stored in much higher densities in the
catalyst material than can even in its liquid form? How does the density of the
atoms (e.g. Hydrogen) compare to the density of Hydrogen once it is absorbed in
the catalyst? I suppose it is stored in the catalyst in monatomic form to avoid
Covalent bond length constraints. I appreciate it might be a difficult answer
due to the 2D structure of the Rydberg matter crystals. I'm wondering if it is
release from such material in a constrained environment if it has no choice but
to form Rydberg matter.
2. I understand that according to Holmlids experiment and some others it takes
some time to prepare the material. I understood that this might be to prepare
the material either to generate the right surface conditions to form Rydberg
Matter, to absorb sufficient Hydrogen in to catalyst or to produce sufficient
quantities of Rydberg matter it self. Is this you understanding or are you also
suggesting that maybe the time is also to Energise the SPP somehow? If so would
this have transport implications due to stability or would we assume the matter
is kept in one place during the charging and eventual test?
3. Once an SPP is formed can it sustain itself for long periods of time… what
limits this is there a limit to the rate it can generate IR radiation or
evaporate through Hadronisation for example?
4. What is the maximum energy that can be contained in one SPP. Would it be
sufficient for Hadronisation? Or would it act in some way to catalyse some how
the Hadronisation process?
5. If and SPP is slowly generated would it spontaneously Hadronise, radiate or
stimulate other material. Or would it require an additional tigger… I'm
wondering why the laser or fluorescent lamps would be sufficient to trigger
Meson production tom an SPP but the SPP does not generate them continuously
before the stimulus is applied in these cases. (I appreciate it may randomly
trigger later with out stimulation).
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:01:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Would Rydberg Matter in Cosmic Radiation.
From: janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
A lot of energy is required to setup the condensate of SPPs, but once the SPP
condensate is in place, it is highly efficient because it recycles energy
produced by the meson decay chain back into the SPP condensate. The energy loss
comes from EMF production and the generation of electrons. Any energy from muon
catalyzed fusion or pion or magnetic based nuclear disruption would find it
way into the condensate.
Inputs
The SPP provides three mechanisms that produce energy: entanglement, particle
production and magnetism.
outputs
The SPP produces heat, XUV and X-ray radiation, magnetism, and electrons as
output.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
1 GeV could be enough to generate Phi Mesons and Kaons through nucleon
resonance, although I suppose other factors such as resonance Windows and
conservation of states would need to be taken into account. I wonder if they
can provide an initial trigger to initiate LENR in the correctly resonating
medium. If nucleon disintegration is triggered perhaps enough energy is
generated and particles to sustain the process.
I suppose I cosmic radiation is a trigger the South Atlantic Anomally will
suddenly become prime real estate! 😉
Sent from my iPhone
On 29 Oct 2015, at 13:55, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
Interesting conjecture and it shouldn’t be too hard to falsify. This precise
suggestion with Rydberg matter has not come up before AFAIK, but going back to
the early days of cold fusion, it had been suggested that one reason why P&F
seemed to have a higher success rate was the elevation of Salt Lake City… which
permitted a much larger flux of cosmic rays. Muons are known to catalyze
deuterium fusion, no Rydberg matter required. However (and I do not have a
citation) this premise was apparently tested many years ago, and found not to
be accurate. Apparently Pd-D cold fusion does not benefit from higher muon
flux. That could mean many things – including the lack of deuteron fusion as
the relevant explanation for excess heat. From: Stephen Cooke I meant
"encounter a 1 GeV muon" but neutrino encounters (with possibly even higher
Energy) might also be potentially interesting if they can occur.
> Would Rydberg Matter or UDD be more sensitive to muons from cosmic rays or
> may be even neutrinos? Than ordinary matter?
>
> Cosmic ray muons have can have high energy for example there are 10000 1 GeV
> muons per sq meter per second. Their interaction with ordinary matter is very
> low. I think this has been discussed before but I wonder if there is a higher
> cross section with Rydberg matter.
>
> What is the surface area of the Rydberg matter
>
> 10000 per sq m /s is I think about 864 per sq mm per day, which implies if
> that if Rydberg matter or UDD is a few 10s micrometers in size it should
> encounter a neutrino about daily on average.
>
> The rest would depend on the probability of an encounter actually reacting
> with the matter,I suppose relativistic effects on the wave functions would
> also be important at these energies.
>
> I guess this has come up before so if you have a link let me know.
