See Sveinn Ólafsson and Leif Holmlid presentation
tempid.altervista.org/SRI.pdf On page 38, blue and origen filters were used producing a change in response Page 28...frequency and intensity dependency. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Axil Axil > > > Sveinn: The feeble laser 10ns, 100mw pulse is the sole initiator of this > if he is hitting different amount of p(0) or d(0) the correlated amount of > particle current is generated…. For comparison, A laser pointer can > produce a green light. High-end: Wicked Lasers E2 Elite Fusion > <http://www.wickedlasers.com/lasers/Elite_Pro-89-37.html>. $199.00 > Wavelength: > 532nm. Power: 150mW. It looks like the reason that this green laser > frequency works for the Swedes has a lot to do with the nanostructure of > the Shell 105 catalyst. It is most unusual and it is doubtful that an > experimenter could find anything similar with a nickel catalyst. Anyway, > the combo seems to have been an “inspired” choice, to use this frequency of > light with this particular catalyst. If they had opted for the red > frequency of the Letts/Cravens effect, it possibly would have been too long > and not worked. There are several good images here (worth a thousand > words) which show the hexagonal porosity of the iron oxide - and the > uniform dimension of the openings which is larger than the wavelength of > the laser light – but not much larger. > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352214315000106 I > realize this is a simulation, but other references indicate that this > particular catalyst has natural, uniform porosity. However, this geometry > does not seem to support the likelihood of DCE as soundly as if it was > larger (2 nm). >
