Siegel....well.....doubt that he even cares about this Oct Paper: https://www.academia.edu/17964553/Condensed_Matter_Nuclear_Science_October_2015 Per Aspera...Ad Astra, Ron..I would rather have my mind opened by the joy of discovery..than closed by my beliefs!!!! Siegel mission was a conclusion even before he began to write.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Ron Kita <[email protected]> wrote: > Ahhh....the famous Edison light bulb scam: Light cannot be created > without something being burned! Grins, Ron Kita, Chiralex > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hmm permalink didn't work, but here it is: >> >> Alain Coetmeur 4 hours ago >> >> EmDrive phenomenon is still uncertain, and may well be an unimagined >> artifact. Unimagined because until now, no artifact was able toe explain >> the result, and EmDrive phenomenon was replicated. >> >> Ethan Siegel, as usual give priority to theory facing evidences. >> >> On E-cat I can, only laugh at his misinformation. The same way, he reject >> evidences only from theory, despite a much more serious list of >> experimental evidences, he reject not only E-cat but also LENR aka cold >> fusion. >> >> E-cat reality, I concede, is mostly supported by business evidence, like >> Tom darden commitment, 50M$ investment by Woodford fund, Fortune article >> interviewing Tom darden and even strange name-dropping of Time magazine >> with “Industrial Heat” Experimental evidence of E-cat are mostly loose, and >> the only serious experimental evidence, the calorimetry of Ferrara test, >> the melting in Ferrara, and Lugano test isotopic shift, are hidden by smoke >> screen of false informations and conspiracy theories. The bad job or Rossi >> until Ferrara, and then on the Swedish physicists prevented better evidence >> to be clear. Anyway, people doing, like Woodford fund, their due diligence >> can acquire solid evidence. Since Woodford fund is very famous in UK, many >> other actors are looking at it. >> >> However LENR, despite the pathological consensus, is beyond the >> reasonable doubt. >> >> There is hundreds of peer reviewed papers that are produced by many >> scientists, from various scientists in many countries, in many recognized >> organizations. The consensus denying LENr reality is no less than a >> groupthink, a collective denial. >> >> Lawrence Forsley just published on Academia.edu a document listing the >> best papers presenting, among others, the numerous replications of US Navy >> Spawar co-deposition LENR experiment. There is much more, and all is denied >> without any rational reason. >> >> This is why no less than Airbus Chief scientist is now supporting LENR >> startups (like LENR-Cities), and organizing LENr Workshop in Airbus resort >> (Toulouse). >> >> Instead of parroting theory justified denial, I would appreciate Forbes >> reports Woodford fund investment, Airbus Innovations movements, Tohoku >> University LENR lab newly created with MHI and CleanPlanet, Baishishan >> technology park welcoming Tom darden E-cat technology, and maybe more that >> some journalist present in LENRG-Oxborf, LENRG-Milan, LENRG-Neuchatel, >> should have reported. >> >> Ethan Siegel is very good in explaining theory, and showing how evidence >> match the theory. >> >> With evidence that don’t match the theory, I think he is clearly out of >> his domain of competence. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Brilliant smackdown: >>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/08/the-em-drive-nasas-impossible-engine-highlights-our-greatest-failing/?commentId=comment_blogAndPostId/blog/comment/4033-120-22 >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> What's particularly arrogant is he says "respect scientists" but then >>>> he's denigrating all of the extremely well educated and talented scientists >>>> that actually believe in cold fusion. >>>> >>>> I think Ethan is having a nervous breakdown. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's just click bait. Move on. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The usual ranting of Ethan Siegel against anomalies that don't >>>>>> respect theory. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/08/the-em-drive-nasas-impossible-engine-highlights-our-greatest-failing/ >>>>>> >>>>>> one day we will have to tell him what is science. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
