*Magnetic monopole beam *

One of the amazing revelations that has come out of nanoplasmonic research
and experimentation is the explanation of how the “dark mode” polariton
soliton can produce a monopole magnetic beam. This amazing revelation is
not theory; it is based on experimental results. But there is a theoretical
explanation that goes along with the experimental data (10). The monopole
magnetic beam becomes pronounced at polariton soliton (PS) intermediate
energy levels since the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) aligns all the
spins of the polaritons inside the soliton to project out of the soliton
from its center perpendicular to its direction of wave rotation.

The polariton has a spin of 2. The number of polaritons that can be
absorbed into the soliton is not limited by the fermion exclusion
principle. There is even an experimental micrograph that shows the soliton
and the monopole beam coming out of it.



This beam can project out to 100 microns away from the soliton.



It is not only the spin of the polaritons that contribute to the power of
the monopole beam but it is also the angular momentum of polariton rotation
that multiplies the magnetic power of the beam. The vortex rotation rate
acts like a train of gears where the microparticle (large gear) drives the
angular momentum of the hydrogen Rydberg matter (small gear).



In the most dramatic case, the 100 micron particle transfers angular
momentum to a hydrogen Rydberg matter particle which is comprised of a
large number of graphite like layered hexagonal disk assemblages with a
diameter just a few atoms across.



Each atomic layer receives angular momentum from the vortex on the surface
of the micro particle and that vortex motion is transferred to the small
atomic hexagonal disks comprising the Rydberg matter. The spin multiplier
that comprises the monopole beam is proportional to the ratio between the
circumference of the 100 micron particle to the circumference of the
hydrogen Rydberg matter hexagonal disk.




The monopole magnetic beam is a primary mechanism of catalytic action in
LENR. The beam can reach out without being depleted and disrupt an
indeterminate number of atomic sites. The experiments of J,C.Fisher can be
explained by the action of this beam.


http://www.markfisher.net/johnfisher/papers/Bigshower.pdf

Energetic particle shower in the vapor from electrolysis



This experiment informs us about the nature of the NAE. The experiment
related in this article uses CR-39 particle detectors to show the
production of energetic particles in the mobile NAE afloat in the vapor
above an electrolytic LENR cell. This NAE  has become mobile after it has
become detached from its point of creation somewhere on the lattice of the
electrodes within the cell as it moves upward in the vapor produced by the
action of electrolysis and the heat that this electrode produces. This NAE
produces hundreds of thousands of charged particles as it floats upward out
of the cell. This reaction most probably produces alpha particles as the
NAE raises on the vapor currents upward out of the cell. The analysis in
the article finds that this NAE is a point source of these alpha particles
by correlating the angles of the pits produced by the charged particles as
the NAE rises. This behavior implies that the NAE supports a continuous and
long lasting LENR process that proceeds over a considerable duration of
time. This mobile type of NAE must decouple from its point of creation on
the lattice of the electrode and floats on air currents like a particle of
dust. The mesoscopic NAE must be massive in size to be so driven by
molecules of air and water vapor.


In this experiment, the monopole beam projects out of the center of the
mobile soliton up to 100 microns as it floats upward. The mobile SPP
soliton can produce LENR reactions at a distance or it can enter the CR-39
detector strips and initiate LENR reactions inside the structure of the
detectors as John Fisher has reported in his experiments

10 - Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic
monopoles
arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf

Reply via email to