I think the statement, "What happens to a photon in a strong magnetic field is solved by classical (Maxwell,s) theory I believe." is probably only correct only in the part that you believe it. No one really knows what a photon is (try to find some good scholarly articles on what a photon IS), so they declared it a fundamental particle. Maxwell's theory is a good physical model with wide applicability, but I doubt that the real behavior of a photon can be modeled with a linear solution like Maxwell's theory. Some have tried to describe the photon as a soliton, but solitons are a solution of nonlinear differential equations and Maxwell is linear.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > > What happens to a photon in a strong magnetic field is solved by classical > (Maxwell,s) theory I believe. Axil’s ENP’s may be nothing more that strong > magnetic lines of force. Such lines of force may be enhanced by > ferromagnetic material and/or directed in certain directions in Rossi’s > reactor. At sufficient magnitude they may also direct EM radiation and or > change its frequency. We do not know what happens in nano materials. > Rossi has indicated normal physics is all that is required to understand > his reactor. He seems to disbelieve the exotic ideas Axil brings to the > table. It would be interesting to ask him whether he the concept of > virtual particles and the 5th dimension Fran and other Vorts have > hypothesized form time to time. > > Bob Cook >
