On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote:
This is a clearly refutes the skeptic's position in his argument that the > Coulomb barrier cannot be overcome at low temperature. If that fundamental > argument is wrong, what else do they have wrong? > I like your argument in general, as well as your summary of the problem of inadequate knowledge about Coulomb barrier penetration. About the Coulomb barrier in relation to the appearance of tritium of the kind seen by Tom Claytor, it is possible that the two are unrelated, and the tritium comes from other processes. An example is the possibility of an endothermic electron capture along the following lines: e- + 3He => e- + neutrino + t - 19 keV Eric
