Hey where was that great email about Wolfram.  Why am I not getting in
email?

The people complain about LENR censorship.  LOL!

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:20 AM, John Berry <[email protected]> wrote:

> Way back when multiple people apparently replicated the capwarp
> successfully, reporting their results in Vort.
>
> I recall one guy even made a capacitor using the pages of a book as the
> dielectric and claimed results.
> http://amasci.com/caps/capwarp.html
>
> Well now there is a fascinating claim that a segmented circular capacitor
> is at the heart of "alien reproduction vehicle" demoed at an exclusive
> airshow in the 80's made by the US military contractors, much inline with
> what Ben Rich, second director of Skunkworks has said, that we have built
> the craft to go to the stars already.  And General Wesley Clark, the kind
> of brass who might have attended an air show like the one in the following
> video has said when he was running for president that his only faith based
> initiative is that FTL travel is possible.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM8YsBiOw1c
>
> This second video has more of McCandlish , and the second link points to a
> part where an HV cap loses all weight, tried by a college student.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUVoWlSHkg4   especially from
> https://youtu.be/SUVoWlSHkg4?t=2709
>
> In an old Rex Research infolio I bought in the 90;'s, there was an account
> of a science fare project by a Doyle (or Boyle?) who made an HV cap with
> polystyrene insulation, and it lost weight, but unlike Brown's research, it
> lost weight no mater which pole was up.
>
> I also read about some of Brown's work where he distinguished between some
> portion that was directional thrust, and another portion that was a
> straight weight loss.
>
> I can expand these correlations further but this is enough to show that
> there is likely something to this.
> While he magnitude of the effect seems to be dependent on the material
> used as dielectric (ironically heavier is better) and the capacitor being
> circular and perhaps segmented.
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to