Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote:

> For long the scientists have a real job, like tax officer (Lavoisir),
> patent officer (Einstein), Engineer and painter (Da vinci), industrialists
> (Wright brothers, Lumière brothers),..
> The scientists did not have to please their peers to eat, but to please a
> client with things that works, or just to please themselves.
>

The other problem is that science has become very expensive to do. It used
to be much cheaper. Instruments and experiments were simpler. This is
because we knew less. There was low-hanging fruit that could be harvested
by simple means. Oersted discovered electromagnetism with a device that
anyone can make for a few dollars. Henry made tremendously improved
electromagnets with simple materials. Even though the devices were simple,
the effect was not on a small scale, and every technically smart person
could see it was important. By 1833, Henry's magnets could pick up 3300
lbs. Henry's work soon led to the magnetic telegraph, one of the most
important discoveries in history.

Even in the 20th century, the first cyclotron made by Lawrence was a
hand-held instrument that cost a few hundred dollars. Granted, a few years
later they were making gigantic ones.

Nowadays, to make progress in cold fusion I expect people will need
millions of dollars worth of the latest gadgets that combine SEMs with
spectroscopy to reveal microscopic details with the elements in various
colors. Or STM microscopes. I think people need gadgets like this to
confirm Ed Storms' hypothesis, for example.

Those are marvelous gadgets and I do not begrudge them to the researchers.
The money spent on such instruments is trivial compared to what cold fusion
will earn back. If it becomes generally used, it will pay back all of the
research money every few minutes for centuries to come. However,
unfortunately, we are talking about millions of dollars needed upfront
before progress can be made.

- Jed

Reply via email to