[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came across this while searching for six dimensional theories:
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg18925331.200.html
excerpt:
Claims of the possibility of "gravity reduction" or "anti-gravity"
induced by magnetic fields have been investigated by NASA before (New
Scientist, 12 January 2002, p 24). But this one, Dröscher insists, is
different. "Our theory is not about anti-gravity. It's about
completely new fields with new properties," he says. And he and Häuser
have suggested an experiment to prove it.
This will require a huge rotating ring placed above a superconducting
coil to create an intense magnetic field. With a large enough current
in the coil, and a large enough magnetic field, Dröscher claims the
electromagnetic force can reduce the gravitational pull on the ring to
the point where it floats free. Dröscher and Häuser say that to
completely counter Earth's pull on a 150-tonne spacecraft a magnetic
field of around 25 tesla would be needed. While that's 500,000 times
the strength of Earth's magnetic field, pulsed magnets briefly reach
field strengths up to 80 tesla. And Dröscher and Häuser go further.
With a faster-spinning ring and an even stronger magnetic field,
gravitophotons would interact with conventional gravity to produce a
repulsive anti-gravity force, they suggest.
<end>
There's more here; but, this is harder to understand than
Beta-atmosphere:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heim_theory
___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com
Nice one! This guys just reinvented John Searls seg. The seg self cools
to extremely low temperature and has spinning rollers on spinning rings.
If only we could convert Johns theory into equations we would be on our
way. The field strengths are about right. Dröscher and Häuser may have
done the equations that we need. Wont it be cool to have a true space
drive finally. Wont it be even cooler to discover that we had a
prototype in the 1960's! That will give the skeptics a migraine.
I wonder how the equations fit with Dr Podkletnov's work?
