Clarification of previous posting:

... since I may check back on this prediction in January 2007 (typically as a humbling experience, as I am no prophet) and since excimer near-UV lasers have indeed already been used in CF prior to now (successfully), let me hedge a little on this 'New Year prediction for 2006' which is specifically for the application of solid-state UV to a Letts/Cravens type LENR cell (which is magnetized).

Furthermore, and most importantly I think the results will be so spectacular that a clear route to a commercial device will then be evident (at least to futurists). This is significant in itself because the "end-game" has never really been all that evident in LENR before (outside of JR's book, which is not that specific as to the details of the device itself). By 'end-game' it is meant a clear picture of what the commercial device will look like in detail.

This predicted upcoming experiment will point directly to the advantage of using many very small LENR cells which are irradiated by UV in addition to having electrical contacts (to retain the full gas loading) plus it will have dual levels of etched microchannels - one for admitting pressurized D2 gas and the other for circulating the coolant to the TEC/TEPG (thermoelectric converter) cells - all formed on the same "chip" structure. The semiconductor laser and the TEC semiconductor used different types of semiconductors, so this may be a hybrid arrangement but the point is that -in effect - we have a 'integrated energy circuit,' manufactured using the well-know microlithography techniques of the semicondutor industry.

Here is information already alluded to many times on vortex over the years about advanced TEC/TEPG ... which is going ro be both "nano" and "etched" in commercial devices:
http://www.azonano.com/news.asp?newsID=738
http://quantum.soe.ucsc.edu/publications/HoKiScience04.pdf

To backtrack a bit in the historical context: in '97-98 the Italians were already using UV irradiation and with great success (but apparently not many here remember it). Vincenzo Nassisi et al. did work reported in Infinite Energy, July-November 1997 "Morphologic Deformation and Distribution of Generated Elements in Saturated Palladium Samples Processed by a UV Excimer Laser,"

This article reports on the experimental results obtained from very thin saturated palladium hydrides irradiated by a XeCl excimer laser (bulky and inefficient). The wavelength was over 300 nm which actually is "near UV" but nevertheless the results were so successful and professionally done that one wonders what became of it. It should be noted that solid-state UV was NOT available then, and perhaps the Italian researchers could not imagine a successful "end game" based on using the eximer laser - so they did not press for continued funding. A short-sighted delay, let us say.

However, the massive transmutation of many elements was evident in this work - and in very high percentages at the NAS (nuclear active sites). IN fact almost no Pd was left at those sites. No calorimetry was done, due to the contraints of the experment, but with this much nuclear transmutation, surely there is significant excess energy potential and without radiation risks (which were absent).

This experiment begs to be repeated using loaded-titanium as the target, and solid state lasers, which are also now at the "near UV' level of around 300 nm. When they reach 150 nm, then an additional 3200% of spectral energy density will be available. At that point, the 'end-game will be crystal clear and commercialization is almost inevitable ;-)

Yeah, I know. That may be well past 2006, but let's hear it for 'optimism' at least at the first of January.

This Italian job - and so many other promising experiments were perhaps a few years ahead of their time, and probably fell victim to funding contstraints, but to me the impressive results are 'one more brick in the wall' of growing "Connections" (in the tradition of Burke) which will eventually enclose the LENR arena and usher in a new age of cheap distributed power.

How is that for a promising-poetic-prediction? ... and why am I sounding like a one-man-band when it comes to exuding a high degree of optimisim for LENR in 2006?

Jones

Reply via email to