In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:13:52 -0600: Hi, [snip] >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:14 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > >The bottom line is that it is easy to produce a non radiating structure of >> any degree of complexity as long as the currents flowing within that >> structure are constant. An orbitsphere such as Mills appears to refer to >> is a simple example. >> > >Stefan Israelsson Tampe explained sometime back that the orbitsphere is >characterized by a non-constant charge distribution in which the charge is >proportional to the real value of one of the spherical harmonics: > This is a rewording of Mills claim that the pseudo charge is the cause of the shrinking orbitsphere.
>https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg105034.html > >If Stefan is correct, it seems that Mills is proposing a current that >varies along the surface of the orbitsphere, i.e., is not constant. No. Mills proposes a pseudo charge that is different for different sized orbitspheres, but is constant for any given size. IOW it only changes when the orbitsphere changes in size. However he also states that radiation can occur during such a change. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
