Having got to grips with the powers that be I now 
see that Jones was right to resist me over the water 
vs ice debate regarding the use of same as a fuel 
in I.C.E. engines.

Even though water at 0 degrees contains less global 
volume than ice at 0 degrees, it contains less fine 
scale hierarchical strain.

Water as water contains the maximum strain energy 
at 4 deg.C.

But water -> ice is not only an expansion where 
the water is loosing energy (doing work), but 
there is also a phase change brought about by 
B-atm pressure.

I was basing my thinking on the full stress-
strain curve of concrete where there is no 
phase change as the concrete breaks up into 
smaller bits - well - not the kind of phase 
change from water to ice, anyway.

So though internal energy is lost: 
WATER -> expanded WATER at 0 deg.C - 
energy is gained:
expanded WATER -> samevolume ICE at 0 deg.C. 

How, you may ask? 

It is gained by internal distortion of 
the water molecule. Something like, say, 
the molecule  being strained from its 
"free" shape to something more nearly 
approaching the internal angle of a hexagon - 
which is what? 120 deg. It doesn't quite 
reach 120 - unlike carbon in graphite, 
which is why the hexagon is a distorted 
"saddle" or "chair" shape. Presumably in 
isomers like ICE 9 the internal strain 
is even greater and so the density is 
correspondingly less.

One can make a comparison with the 
isothermal and adiabatic states of a gas.

The isothermal state 

    PV = a constant = P(L^3)

is at the lowest internal strain boundary 
state.

The adiabatic state 

    PV^(5/3) = a constant = P(L^5/L^3)

is at a higher internal strain, viz. the 
heat strain of the atoms.

We can view it this being two linear dimensions 
higher. And to use Beene's terminology, "the 
dimension doesn't show up in our universe," 
since, of course, our universe is at the level, 
the scale, of total volume, L^3. 

There is in fact a very small increase in 
total volume since the atoms are distorted 
by the increasing impact rate from a prolate 
spheroid to an even more prolate spheroid - 
but this increase is so small as to be 
immeasurable [though imaginable 8-) ]

The internal volumes can muck around as 
much as they like. If internal volume changes 
don't alter our 3D total volume then they 
are not going to butter any parsnips - 
they are not going to give us any useful 
work output - they are not going to move 
the pistons in our I.C.E. engines.

So, one can see that it is possible to 
have a gas in an adiabatic state which 
even though it has a higher volume than 
the same mass of gas in a isothermal state, 
it contains more energy. It contains this 
energy in two hidden dimensions - hidden 
because they are internal - hidden, because 
these internal lengths can increase without 
showing up on the outside - in our universe
in other words.  Geddit?   8-) 

In fact, if you think about it, we don't 
need to go through worm holes to find hidden 
dimensions and their alien inhabitants. 
We can find them right here on earth and 
have been doing so ever since that simple 
fabric merchant, Leeuwenhoek, sparked by a 
natural and insatiable curiosity first gazed 
at a drop of pond water under his "glass 
pearl" microscope and marvelled at the 
aliens he saw there.

http://www.funsci.com/fun3_en/usph/usph.htm

Now water has a PV^6 = PL^(18) which is 
fifteen "hidden" dimensions higher than PL^3.

Of course there is a lot of hidden Pee as 
well. But if one exposes the existence of 
the Beta-atmosphere to the public gaze 
then this Big Pee is no longer hidden and 
is seen in all its glory.

For the pee we apply is only a little pee. 

The Pee in PV^6 is Total Pee.
i.e. ambient B-a Pee + applied pee.

       P = P(0) + p

What is clearly demonstrated by the Bridgman's 
compressibility relations for fluids and the 
power relations for ice/water/steam vapour 
pressure is that in using power curves it is 
vital to start from the right origin of the 
species. The Kelvin origin is fine used for 
its original purpose, ideal gas relationships, 
but when it is applied to relations, such as 
the aforementioned, the result is complete...
what is that word I am looking for.... ah, 
yes, complete bollocks.  8-)

In effect, the adiabatic equation of state 
for the ideal gas is just one of a whole 
host of such equations which one can easily 
discover once one has jettisoned Kelvin's 
straight jacket and Albert's denial of the 
devil's existence.

For the benefit of Vortexian atheists, who 
are doubtless legion, ;-) I should explain 
that Lucifer is a Latin word made up of, 
lux (light; genitive lucis) and ferre (to 
bear, to bring) and that in saying the 
aether doesn't exist one is implicitly 
saying that Satan doesn't exist - which, 
as anyone knows who has read the C.S.Lewis's 
Screwtape Letters, pleases the devil greatly.

All civil and structural engineer are 
aware that strain energy, both positive 
and negative, can be stored at many 
different scales; which is another way 
of saying many different dimensions. 
The highest dimension I remember from my 
student days is d4x/dy4 for cantilever 
deflection which give a fourth power on 
integration. 

Th highest power I have ever encountered 
in my research career is 42 for the wetting 
and drying relations between [Volume of 
Solids/Total Volume] and pF for Weald Clay 
(Ditchling Common).

Clearly, there is a whole host of these 
meta-adiabatic equations of state out there 
just waiting for someone to uncover them. 
All that's needed is for people to get off 
their butts and to recognise that different 
species have different origins.

Cheers,

Frank Grimer




Reply via email to