More... http://arxiv.org/pdf/1404.5685v2.pdf
Quantum Mass Acquisition in Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensate(BEC) it seems that excited spin 2 spinor quasi-particles (dark mode polaritons) become massive do to quantum fluctuations in their energy state when these vortexes are in an excited state within a BEC. This peculiar type of particles are called quasi-Nambu-Goldstone (qNG) bosons, which are gapless exciations that do not originate from spontaneous symmetry breaking. The qNG bosons have been a vital ingredient in high-energy physics. They behave like Goldstone bosons at the zeroth order but acquire energy gaps due to higher-order cor- rections. We can see these particles now inside a LENR reactor. If you can digest math that can kill an elephant, the above reference lays it all out root and branch. A Noble prize is to be had here that explains how LENR produced by polaritons in a interstellar dusty plasma gas can produce the huge masses seen in dark matter that can hold galaxies together. Good luck and good theorizing. On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > http://phys.org/news/2015-02-nanovortices.html > > Nanovortices have mass. This has profound implications for the > characterization of cosmic LENR. There is evidence that space is filled > with excited hydrogen and helium. These vast areas between galaxies form > dusty plasma that produce extreme ultraviolet light and soft x-rays to the > tune of 400% above any possible celestial body source. The dark matter > inside galaxies behave as if this strange stuff was coherent and exist in a > huge galaxy wide BEC. > > I had conjectured that Cosmic LENR had mass and it was in fact the source > of the mass attributed to dark matter. Well here is the experiment that > shows that nano vortices which includes LENR associated vertices have mass. > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 3:11 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I would assume that our solar system is used as a model when the behavior >> of the entire galaxy is predicted by astronomers. We constantly >> see reports that indicate that dark matter is much more abundant than is >> normal visible matter which seems to be a contradiction within our solar >> system. From your answer blow it seems that you are suggesting that the >> dark matter is hiding within plain view along with visible matter. This is >> strange behavior for material that can not be located by the best >> scientific efforts thus far. >> >> How would this dark matter condense into, for example, a star? That >> process must release stored energy as it takes place which should be >> measurable. I would think that dark matter that could be confined into >> small objects such as planets would become highly visible as the >> gravitationally held together mass condenses into a smaller volume. >> >> Would not matter of the nature that you are discussing behave somewhat >> like normal air? It is not visible to the naked eye, but it offers >> resistance to objects passing through it and it has gravitational mass. It >> can be condensed into small sized objects as it cools. Normal radiation is >> emitted as the cooling process takes place. >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sat, Jan 30, 2016 1:33 pm >> Subject: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Pluto is alive—but where is the heat coming from? >> >> *From:* David Roberson >> >> Ø … does it not seem strange that astronomers can accurately predict >> the orbits of the planets without assuming any dark matter within the solar >> system? >> >> Dave, they would need to know the net mass and the center of mass in >> order to predict orbits. But the sequence of events, historically, is that >> astronomers first refined their knowledge of orbits based on observation >> over the centuries, going back to prehistory - and then in modern times, >> worked backwards to determine net mass. >> >> As a practical matter, they can assume the mass is composed of 100% >> normal matter, but it really doesn’t change things if part of the mass is >> dark – it is still mass. There is no need to differentiate, in order to >> predict orbits, unless dark matter does not interact gravitationally in the >> same way as normal matter. Small eccentricities do turn up – which were/are >> not predictable – even today. >> >> The mass of the Kuiper belt is presently low and so far removed that it >> doesn’t affect any orbit other than Pluto, with slight influence on >> Neptune. Kuiper total mass is estimated at 1/25th the mass of the Earth. >> That can tell us something important. >> >> This is because the models of Solar System formation predict an initial >> collective mass for the Kuiper belt of 30 Earth masses (according to Wiki >> and more elsewhere). Thus, there is missing mass today of about 99% of the >> former level. If the Kuiper belt had always existed at its current low >> density, the large objects like Pluto simply could not have formed. Some of >> that missing mass could be dark matter which was collected and removed by >> one or more objects. >> >> Fast forward to the recent discovery of Planet X, the ninth planet (if we >> accept the demotion of Pluto). As it turns out, most of the missing Kuiper >> mass could be found in this one object. Some could also be found in Neptune. >> >> Note that the interior of Neptune is over 5000 degrees C, despite it >> getting almost zero solar irradiation - and its net mass is anomalously >> large by some formation theories. This could indicate that Neptune too has >> captured dark matter from the Kuiper belt (assuming that captured dark >> matter undergoes nuclear reactions to provide the internal heat). >> >> > >
