Bob, It is an interesting article and It agrees with my own neo Lorentzian perspective that virtual particles are the medium of the temporal axis only becoming physical when passing thru what it perceive as a 2d spatial plane even though we experience it as 3d. IMHO all physical matter and our definition of elements in the periodic table are the result of these particles passing thru or becoming stuck and persisting in our plane as matter and continuing to interact / maintained in our plane by the energy of the passing stream - the future and past being reservoirs of unphysical virtual particles flowing like water with detours and eddys when it intersects our plane where matter already occupies it's intersection point. M&M proved there is little or no spatial bias to the ether and Lorentzian formulas tell us there is a pythgorean relationship wrt time dilation and contraction so why cant we accept an ether that lives on the time axis and passes thru our plane at 90 degrees to all spatial axis?
I don't think this back flow of "time" would even allow us to communicate much less travel thru time. I think f/h are contracted atoms sent from our inertial plane down into these pockets where the density of this stream is reduced by Casimir geometry. It is equivalent to the paradox twin stationed near a black hole trying to to communicate with himself in the future via messages sent out on mail rockets that escape the relativistic well and can communicate with each other.. both rockets age faster and can communicate with each other but can not get the info back to the "slow" twin without experiencing the same Lorentzian translation back to the original inertial frame. Fran : Saturday, February 06, 2016 11:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space== Fran-- Take a look at the following link regarding the nature of time and space. I noticed it when reading you last email regarding crack production you sent. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160128122011.htm Bob Cook
