In reply to esa ruoho's message of Sun, 7 Feb 2016 22:34:38 +0200: Hi esa, [snip]
Dave is perhaps better positioned to comment, but for what it's worth, I think you would end up with an excellent electrical heater. ;) If you want an OU motor, then the back EMF has to *exceed* the forward EMF, not be equal to zero. Back EMF is your friend, not your enemy. It is what ensures that the majority of the energy fed to an electric motor ends up as mechanical energy, not as heat in the windings. >So uhh noone has anything to say about this? > >--- >| Esa Ruoho | +358403703659 | http://fi.linkedin.com/in/esaruoho ><http://fi.linkedin.com/in/esaruoho> | >| http://lackluster.bandcamp.com <http://lackluster.bandcamp.com/> | >http://lackluster.org <http://lackluster.org/> | http://esaruoho.tumblr.com ><http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/> | >| http://twitter.com/esaruoho <http://twitter.com/esaruoho> | >http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial ><http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial> | > >> On 04 Feb 2016, at 23:59, Esa Ruoho <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, I'm putting this out here, hoping for some sort of layman's explanation >> of these two things. >> >> 1- What is Back EMF / Lenz Law? >> 2- What would happen if a Motor-generator could be built that was immune to >> BackEMF/Lenz Law/ (sometimes referred to as Back Torque)? >> >> >> >> -- >> --- >> http://twitter.com/esaruoho <http://twitter.com/esaruoho> // >> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com <http://lackluster.bandcamp.com/> // >> +358403703659 // >> skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ >> <http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/> // iMessage: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> // Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
