I wrote: I followed your presentation, ... >
The presentation was a little more opaque than I at first appreciated. "As with Newton's 3rd law, many people miss why conservation of energy should be dependent upon equal and opposite reactions." "Inertia is velocity-independent." "Essentially, accelerating a mass Lenzlessly would present no load upon the power supply - only usual resistance losses remain, following Joule's 2nd law for heat (Q=I^2RT where Q = J and I^2RT is current squared times resistance times time)... calorimetry would thus show gains" "EM or mechanical, the peak efficiency of an N3 break is a power of ten of whatever's input." I take it back. I didn't really understand it. Eric
