A polariton is an entangled photon electron pair. The electron is produced by a dipole vibration of the electron and hole.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWmvZ0IGrsU On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > One interesting issue about the coupling of an SPP and potential photon > multiplication is that there should be a mechanism to allow the transfer of > one quanta of angular momentum at a time. If this is the case, the paper > suggests that SPP’s must have quantum numbers associated with a given SPP > and that there is a quantum number for orbital spin and energy and maybe > intrinsic spin of the photons as well. Are any of the papers considering > quantum numbers for SPP’s? > > My thought is that there may be an obvious mechanism for coupling of an > SPP to lattice electrons and, hence, phonic (heat) energy and angular > momentum as well as the production (release) of individual photons. > > Bob Cook > > *From:* Jones Beene <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 09, 2016 12:02 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:DCE for SPP > > > This could be the sleeper paper of the year. Photon multiplication in an > incandescent cell - due to DCE/SPP would be a mechanism which changes the > whole ball game, if true. As they snidely quip on SNL: Who knew? > > BTW - this M.O. explains how the Lugano results, as clarified by Bob > Higgins to COP~1.5 over 30 days, could have resulted from so low an > inventory of hydrogen. In fact, the gain would have been the same with no > fuel if SPP are supplying it ! > > Simply stated, the gain from the incandescent glow-stick type of reactor > can be the result of photon multiplication during SPP formation. The > nickel and hydrogen can be superfluous. The main requirement is a > nanoporous optically translucent ceramic and an electrically charged > heater coil which can reach incandescence. The energy comes from the > Dynamic Casimir Effect – which is the same as saying, from the zero point > field. > > In a side-by-side test, like the one which Alan Goldwater has been running, > the null side will be as gainful as the loaded side (…if there is gain at > all, but the results give the appearance of no gain). > > *From:* Axil > > Ø All those references to order of magnitude increases sound like > over unity amplification of incoming photons. > > Jones Beene wrote: > > “Dynamical Casimir effect for surface plasmon polaritons” > > The title says it all, in terms of hitting on two of the significant new > catch-phrases which are cropping up in the glow-stick version of LENR, > but the paper (from Estonia) is behind a paywall… > > *http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960114012195* > <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960114012195> > > Ostensibly, it would explain how the SPP can become excessively energetic > in circumstances which are relatively mundane. One message that is > emerging is that SPP formation could be gainful in itself, despite > whatever happens next.* One photon** going** in with two** coming** out… > provides a mechanism for gain if the wavelength is the same.* > > *Abstract* > > The emission of photon pairs by a metal–dielectric interface placed > between the mirrors of the resonator and excited by a plane wave is > considered. The excitation causes oscillations in time of the optical > length of surface plasmon polaritons in the interface. This leads to the > dynamical Casimir effect – the generation of pairs of surface plasmon > polariton quanta, which transfer to photons outside the interface.* In > the case of a properly chosen interface, the yield of two-photon emission > may exceed that of the usual spontaneous parametric down-conversion.* > >
